Loading...
Loading...
Found 3,064 Skills
Use when an idea reaches ApprovedForProject status to create project, plan structure, and commit PLAN.md to repository. Merges project creation and planning into atomic operation.
Analyzes raw requirements into visual specs and generates artifacts. Invoke when user runs /vspec:new for analysis or /vspec:verify for models and prototypes.
Use this skill to ingest external materials into the current project-scoped Obsidian KB as source notes under Sources/Papers, Sources/Web, Sources/Docs, Sources/Data, Sources/Interviews, or Sources/Notes.
Write the canonical engineering record of a fixed bug — root cause, mechanism, fix, validation, and how it slipped through. Engineer-audience, code identifiers welcome. Use after a debug session lands a fix, before closing the ticket. Trigger on /post-mortem, when the user says "write the post-mortem / postmortem / RCA / root cause analysis", "document this fix", "write up the root cause", "close out this bug with a writeup", or hands you a fixed-and-validated bug and asks for the writeup.
Use when planning, running, auditing, or documenting systematic reviews, scoping reviews, PRISMA-style flows, screening decisions, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, or reproducible literature searches.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a README", "generate a README", "make a readme", "write a README for my project", "need a README", "add a README", "document my project", "set up project docs", "readme with badges".
Use when the task involves an external library or package and current API docs are needed before writing code.
Create structured technology trade-off analysis documents with scored comparison matrices. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compare technologies, evaluate architectural options, analyze build-vs-buy decisions, assess migration strategies, or produce any decision document that compares multiple approaches across weighted dimensions. Triggers on: 'trade-off analysis', 'tradeoff', 'comparison matrix', 'evaluate options', 'which technology should we use', 'compare approaches', 'pros and cons of', 'build vs buy', 'migration analysis', 'consolidation analysis', 'technology selection'. Also use when the user has completed technical research and wants to structure findings into a decision document.
Generate a Well-Architected-aligned Architecture Decision Record (ADR) that documents a design decision with context, options evaluated, trade-offs, and WA pillar impact.
Crear o actualizar Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) en docs/adr/. Activar siempre que el usuario quiera documentar, registrar, actualizar o cambiar el estado de una decisión arquitectónica — incluso si no usa la palabra "ADR". Frases que activan este skill: "registrar decisión", "documentar por qué usamos X", "dejar constancia de esta elección técnica", "decision record", "cambiar ADR a Accepted", "marcar como Superseded", "crear ADR", "actualizar ADR", "nuevo ADR", "ADR-XXX". Usar también cuando el usuario describa una tensión arquitectónica que deba quedar documentada.
Analyze existing code to generate structured learning entries documenting patterns, decisions, and concepts. Works on files, directories, or entire projects. Supports selective (3-5 per file) and exhaustive modes, plus source annotations for fine-grained control.
Designs and develops specs following the spec-driven method. Asks clarifying questions before proposing structure, and builds the spec section by section. Use it when starting a large feature, before writing code.