Loading...
Loading...
Found 3,062 Skills
Guide writing a structured initiative brief for roadmap-first planned work in One Horizon. Use when asked to "write an initiative", "draft an initiative brief", "plan this initiative", "turn this idea into an initiative", or "help me scope this roadmap work". This skill produces a design doc, not code. Requires One Horizon MCP.
Archbee integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Archbee data.
Provides rules for writing effective skill descriptions. Use this when setting up frontmatter properties for agent skill documents using starlight-skills. Do not use this for structuring the actual text body or plugin configuration options.
Use this skill whenever creating or editing any markdown file. Do not wait for an explicit request — if a markdown file is being created or edited, this skill applies.
HarmonyOS NEXT (mainly for API 12+; includes a large number of version labels for API 12-23, and a small number of references to earlier versions for comparison) offline reference library navigation: progressively locate documents (ArkTS/ArkUI/NDK) by Kit/task/index.
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
This skill should be used when a team wants to create or refine the technical guidelines document — for example "create the tech steering doc", "document our tech stack", "write the technical guidelines", "document our architecture decisions", "set up the tech steering", or "update the tech doc". Generates docs/steering/TECH.md as a living document capturing the stack, architecture patterns, constraints, commands, and ADRs. Generated once and refined — not regenerated from scratch.
Conduct targeted code exploration on a repository, and document the process of "Asking Questions → Reading Code → Reaching Conclusions" as searchable evidence for direct reuse when similar questions arise next time. There are three types: question (investigate code around a specific problem and provide conclusions), module-overview (organize the structure, boundaries, entry points, and dependencies of a module), spike (conduct lightweight technical exploration of multiple possible directions without making final decisions). Trigger scenarios: When users say "Let's explore first", "How is X implemented in this repository", "Quickly get familiar with this module", "Archive the exploration results". For the distinction from learning / tricks / decisions, refer to the root skill `easysdd`.
Draft or update requirement documents under `easysdd/requirements/` for the project — describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries" using **user stories + plain language**, so non-technical readers can quickly grasp the key highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: when the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or when it is found during the feature-design phase that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.
Exhaustively extract UX patterns from a reference web app. Walks every screen, captures screenshots of every state, records interaction patterns, copy verbatim, keyboard shortcuts, responsive treatments, motion, and empty/error/loading states. Produces a reusable pattern library that other audits can compare against. The inverse of ux-audit — asks 'what is the bar?' rather than 'does this match the bar?'. Trigger with 'learn from X', 'extract patterns from X', 'study X's UX', 'reverse engineer the UX of X', 'build a pattern library from X'.
Follow this sub-process when fixing bugs — turn the verbal description of "problem found" into a closed loop from verification to repair, leaving three documents: problem report, root cause analysis, and repair record. This process adds a buffer between "seeing the problem" and "starting to modify code" to avoid common pitfalls: the problem description in your mind disappears after the fix, you only fix the surface without analyzing the root cause, the scope of repair expands and cannot be traced, and you don't know if the fix is correct without verification after modification. This skill only acts as a router, deciding which of report / analyze / fix to proceed with based on existing artifacts. For simple problems that can be identified at a glance, a fast track will be taken, skipping the two middle steps and only retaining the fix-note.