Loading...
Loading...
Found 817 Skills
Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis
Research-to-implement pipeline chaining 5 MCP tools with graceful degradation
Execute implementation plan tasks with TDD workflow, auto-commit, and phase gates. Use when user says "build it", "start building", "execute plan", "implement tasks", "ship it", or references a track ID. Do NOT use for planning (use /plan) or scaffolding (use /scaffold).
Review pull request feedback with discerning judgment. The lynx scans comments, identifies legitimate concerns, addresses minor issues directly, and plans responses to significant feedback. Use when responding to PR reviews and addressing reviewer concerns.
Auto-selects best Kaizen method (Gemba Walk, Value Stream, or Muda) for target
Review PR comments, discuss improvements, and reply with resolution status
Adaptive test-driven development cycle. Detects harness capabilities and routes to guided (manual phase control) or automated (orchestrated) mode. Invoke with /tdd for automated or /tdd red|domain|green|commit for guided.
Three-stage code review protocol: spec compliance, code quality, and domain integrity. Activate when reviewing code, preparing PRs, assessing implementation quality, or checking that code matches requirements. Triggers on: "review this code", "prepare PR", "check implementation", "code quality", "does this match the spec".
Domain modeling principles: parse-don't-validate, make invalid states unrepresentable, primitive obsession detection, semantic types, and domain veto authority. Activate when designing types, reviewing code for domain integrity, or when domain review is needed in a TDD cycle.
Systematic 4-phase debugging: understand the failure, form hypotheses, test one change at a time, fix with confidence. Activate when tests fail unexpectedly, errors occur, behavior is wrong, or something that worked before is now broken. Triggers on: "debug", "why is this failing", "test failure", "unexpected error", "bug", "broken".
Deep thinking mode - approach problems like a craftsman, obsess over details, and create elegant solutions
Conduct rigorous, adversarial code reviews with zero tolerance for mediocrity. Use when users ask to "critically review" my code or a PR, "critique my code", "find issues in my code", or "what's wrong with this code". Identifies security holes, lazy patterns, edge case failures, and bad practices across Python, R, JavaScript/TypeScript, SQL, and front-end code. Scrutinizes error handling, type safety, performance, accessibility, and code quality. Provides structured feedback with severity tiers (Blocking, Required, Suggestions) and specific, actionable recommendations.