Loading...
Loading...
Found 987 Skills
Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.
Use when reviewing a plan before implementation begins. Not for autonomous plan analysis — use plan-review agent instead. Challenges scope, walks through architecture/quality/tests/performance interactively with mandatory user checkpoints and opinionated recommendations.
Copilot agent that assists with bug investigation, root cause analysis, and fix generation for efficient debugging and issue resolution Trigger terms: bug fix, debug, troubleshoot, root cause analysis, error investigation, fix bug, resolve issue, error analysis, stack trace Use when: User requests involve bug hunter tasks.
Use Codex CLI for sandboxed auditing, debugging, and autonomous prototyping
Defense-in-depth verification before declaring any task complete. Run tests, check build, validate changed files, verify no regressions. Applies 4-level adversarial artifact verification (EXISTS > SUBSTANTIVE > WIRED > DATA FLOWS) with goal-backward framing. Use before saying "done", "fixed", or "complete" on any code change. Use for "verify", "make sure it works", "check before committing", or "validate changes". Do NOT use for debugging (use systematic-debugging) or code review (use systematic-code-review).
Assist developers in writing clean, maintainable code following software engineering best practices. Use when conducting code reviews, refactoring code, enforcing coding standards, seeking guidance on clean code principles, or integrating automated quality checks into development workflows.
Run Claude Code review against the current branch, fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, and leave invalid comments unchanged.
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
Python code refactoring skills, covering code smell identification, design pattern application, readability improvement, and practical experience. This skill is applicable when users request "refactor code", "refactor", "code optimization", "improve code quality", "code smell review", "apply design patterns", "enhance readability", or submit code review requests. It supports generating structured refactoring documents after refactoring completion ("output refactoring document", "generate refactoring report"). It includes practical patterns extracted from 20+ real refactoring PRs in the vllm-ascend repository.
Use when refactoring code with poor names, when asked to improve naming, or when a user struggles to name a class/method/variable. Symptoms include -Manager/-Util suffixes, single-letter variables, process/handle/do verbs, primitive obsession, god methods with multiple responsibilities.
Grill the diff. Specialists evaluate every finding internally — only high-value findings reach the user for discussion until reaching shared understanding.
Review code changes and identify high-confidence, actionable bugs. Use when the user wants to: - Review a pull request or branch diff - Find bugs, security issues, or correctness problems in code changes - Get a structured summary of review findings