Loading...
Loading...
Found 817 Skills
Automated code review assistant that analyzes GitHub pull requests and code changes. Use when: (1) user shares a GitHub PR URL and wants a code review, (2) you need to review code for bugs, security issues, or best practices, (3) performing automated code quality checks before merging, (4) analyzing code diffs for potential improvements.
Generate context-aware code review checklists from PR diffs — tailored to language, codebase patterns, and team standards. Identifies what reviewers should focus on. NOT for automated code fixing, test generation, or security auditing.
Add, remove, or adjust Markuplint rules for specific files or elements. Analyzes violations, proposes scope-appropriate configuration changes, and confirms with the user.
Set up Markuplint in a project from scratch. Detects framework, creates config, runs initial lint, and guides the user through rule adoption with Bulk Suppressions support.
Guides you through migrating markuplint configuration from v4 to v5. Detects current versions, reviews the migration guide, interactively confirms breaking changes and new rules with the user, updates config files and tests. For Claude Code.
Reference knowledge for Markuplint HTML linter. Covers violation interpretation, CLI usage, config patterns, and documentation URLs. Auto-loaded when working with HTML linting.
Ultra-compressed PR review comments. One issue per line: Location • Problem • Fix. Remove preambles, prioritize signals. Supports Japanese. Trigger with "PR review please", "code review", "/review", "/genshijin-review". Candidate for automatic activation during pull request reviews.
SonarCloud integration. Manage Projects. Use when the user wants to interact with SonarCloud data.
Ultra-lightweight channel for refactor processes - used when changes are obviously too small to justify the full scan → design → apply three-stage workflow. AI directly identifies 1-3 low-risk optimization points, confirms with the user once, modifies in-place using classic methods, and validates itself by running tests. No scan checklist, no design documentation, no multi-step HUMAN verification required. Trigger scenarios: When the user says "quick refactor", "small refactor", "simply optimize XX function", "modify directly", "skip all those steps", and the scope of changes is clearly limited to a single function/single component, with tests available for self-validation.
Use when restructuring existing code without changing observable behavior, especially when a feature or bug fix is hard because the current design is awkward, duplicated, confusing, or risky to modify.
Launch an isolated Claude reviewer for the current branch, a specific commit, or uncommitted changes. Uses Claude's agent runtime with worktree isolation so the review has an independent read-only view of the code before findings are reported back.
· Run combined code-review, anti-slop, security-audit, and update-docs pass. Triggers: 'full review', 'review everything', 'audit this repo', 'full check', 'run all checks'. Not for single-dimension audits.