Loading...
Loading...
Found 700 Skills
Multi-framework intelligence brief. Takes any business situation, investment thesis, career decision, or strategic problem and runs it through 4-7 of 11 analytical frameworks (Feynman, Kahneman, Shannon, Tetlock, Duke, Munger, Thiel, Helmer, Christensen, Meadows, Taleb, Bezos). Each framework runs as a distinct sub-analysis producing concrete claims. Contradictions between analyses are surfaced explicitly. Synthesizes into a single brief: Core Argument, Key Insight, load-bearing conditions, failure modes with numeric probabilities, validation tests, recommended action with sizing, and the strongest dissent. Use when the user says "think through this", "analyze this for me", "help me decide", "think", "/think", or presents any complex decision, investment thesis, business question, or strategic problem that warrants structured multi-framework analysis.
Clayton Christensen's Disruption Analysis applied to a company, market, or business idea. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Disruption Cartographer, RPV Diagnostician, Jobs Archaeologist, Trajectory Analyst, Incumbent's Advocate — who each apply a distinct lens from Christensen's framework to evaluate disruption risk and opportunity. The lead synthesizes into a disruption verdict: is this company vulnerable to disruption from below, is this startup on a genuine disruption trajectory, or is this a sustaining innovation that incumbents will crush? Use when the user says "christensen this", "disruption analysis", "is this disruptive", "vulnerable to disruption", or wants to evaluate whether a company/market faces disruption risk. Works as a standalone analysis or paired with /munger for a complete picture.
Charlie Munger's Mental Lattice applied to a business idea. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Mathematician, Psychologist, Inverter, Economist, Moat Analyst — who each apply their discipline's elementary models to the idea. The lead synthesizes into a lollapalooza analysis: which forces stack, which fight you, and the honest Munger verdict. Use when the user says "munger this", "apply the lattice", "what would Charlie think", or proposes a business idea and wants multidisciplinary analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers framework applied to a business. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Power Cartographer, Lifecycle Timer, Counter-Positioning Scout, and Moat Devil's Advocate — who each apply a distinct lens from Helmer's taxonomy. The lead synthesizes into a Power Inventory (what you have), Power Pipeline (what's achievable given your stage), and the honest Helmer Verdict. Use when the user says "helmer this", "apply 7 powers", "what power does this company have", "is this a moat", "diagnose my competitive position", or proposes a business and wants strategic analysis. Works standalone or after /thiel (which confirms you need a monopoly) or /munger (which asks if the economics are durable).
YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively suggest when the user describes a new product idea or is exploring whether something is worth building — before any code is written. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review.
Adaptive exploration pipeline that integrates /brainstorm, /think, and /red-team with intelligent pivoting. Unlike /deepthink (which takes a fixed idea and iterates), /prospect starts with divergent brainstorming, picks the most promising vein, runs deep analysis, and — crucially — can PIVOT back to divergent thinking when: the idea dies under red-team, an adjacent opportunity surfaces during analysis, or the research reveals the real opportunity is elsewhere. Produces a prospecting report: the landscape explored, veins assayed, pivots taken, and the final stake with conviction. Use when the user says "prospect", "explore this space", "find opportunities", "what should I build", "explore and analyze", or has a domain/trend they want to both explore AND evaluate.
Adversarial stress-test of a /think intelligence brief. Reads the think output markdown, then deploys 5-7 of the same analytical frameworks — but each one is hunting exclusively for reasons the recommendation is wrong, the conviction is unearned, and the idea will fail. Every framework becomes a prosecutor, not a judge. Surfaces the strongest kill shots, identifies which parts of the original brief are load-bearing but unverified, and produces a Red Team Report with a survival verdict. Use when the user says "red-team this", "attack this", "poke holes", "steel-man the opposition", "why is this a bad idea", "/red-team", or presents a /think brief they want stress-tested.
Peter Thiel's Monopoly Creation framework applied to a business idea. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Monopoly Anatomist, Secret Hunter, Market Framer, Last Mover Analyst, Girardian — who each apply a distinct lens from Thiel's framework to evaluate whether a venture has genuine monopoly potential. The lead synthesizes into a verdict: does this company have a secret, a 10x advantage, a tiny domination-ready market, and a path to becoming the last mover in its category? Use when the user says "thiel this", "monopoly test", "zero to one analysis", "does this have monopoly potential", or proposes a venture and wants Thiel-style evaluation. Works standalone or after /office-hours and /munger.
Daniel Kahneman's Cognitive Diagnostic applied to a decision, strategy, or business evaluation. Spawns a team of specialist agents — System Detector, Substitution Mapper, Prospect Theorist, Noise Auditor, Outside Viewer — who each apply a different lens from Kahneman's cognitive architecture to audit the decision for bias, noise, and cognitive traps. The lead synthesizes into a contamination assessment: which cognitive systems are operating, which substitutions are active, and whether the decision should proceed, be corrected, or be restructured. Use when the user says "kahneman this", "check my thinking", "am I biased", "audit this decision", "what am I missing", or presents any decision, strategy, or evaluation they want cognitively stress-tested. Works standalone or as a companion to /munger (Munger evaluates the business; Kahneman audits the thinking about the business).
Annie Duke's Decision Quality framework applied to a business decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Resulting Auditor, Calibrator, Pre-Mortem Analyst, Quit Strategist, Process Architect — who each apply a distinct lens from Duke's framework to evaluate whether a decision is sound regardless of outcome. The lead synthesizes into a stacking analysis: which biases are operating, which process flaws exist, and the honest Duke verdict. Use when the user says "duke this", "is this a good bet", "should I quit", "evaluate this decision", or faces any high-stakes choice under uncertainty and wants rigorous decision-process analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
Generative ideation engine. Takes a domain, trend, question, or constraint and produces 15-30 novel possibilities — things that might be true, businesses that could exist, futures that could unfold. Spawns a team of 6 specialist agents — Signal Scout, Analogist, Inverter, Combinator, Contrarian, Futurist — who each generate ideas from a distinct creative angle. The lead cross-pollinates across agents, finds unexpected combinations, and ranks the output by novelty × plausibility. Use when the user says "brainstorm", "what could exist", "what's possible", "generate ideas", "what might be true", "possibilities", or presents a domain and wants divergent exploration rather than evaluation of a specific idea.
Jeff Bezos's Organizational Decision-Making OS applied to any business idea or strategic decision. Applies the full Bezos framework — Type 1/Type 2 doors, flywheel logic, Day 1 diagnostics, regret minimization, and working backwards — to stress-test long-term bets against short-term pressure.