Loading...
Loading...
Found 516 Skills
Time-boxed technical investigation with structured output. Use for feasibility studies, architecture exploration, integration assessment, performance analysis, or risk evaluation. Creates spike tasks in ohno, enforces time-boxing, generates spike reports, and creates actionable follow-up tasks.
Apply Smith and Lewis's paradox theory to identify and manage organizational tensions across performing, organizing, belonging, and learning dimensions. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose persistent either/or tensions, design dynamic equilibrium strategies that embrace both poles, or when they ask 'why does solving this problem make it worse', 'how do we pursue exploration AND exploitation simultaneously', or 'why do our strategic tensions keep recurring despite resolution attempts'.
Create structured plans for any multi-step task -- software features, research workflows, events, study plans, or any goal that benefits from structured breakdown. Also deepen existing plans with interactive review of sub-agent findings. Use for plan creation when the user says 'plan this', 'create a plan', 'write a tech plan', 'plan the implementation', 'how should we build', 'what's the approach for', 'break this down', 'plan a trip', 'create a study plan', or when a brainstorm/requirements document is ready for planning. Use for plan deepening when the user says 'deepen the plan', 'deepen my plan', 'deepening pass', or uses 'deepen' in reference to a plan. For exploratory or ambiguous requests where the user is unsure what to do, prefer ce-brainstorm first.
The root skill of the easysdd workflow family — introduces the workflow system and routes users to the correct sub-skill. Trigger scenarios: Users mention "easysdd", "sdd", "spec-driven", "how to use this set of processes", "which skill should I use", "where to start", or describe a new feature but haven't decided on the entry stage. Known intents (brainstorm/design/implementation/acceptance/BUG/exploration, etc.) will trigger the corresponding sub-skill first instead of this skill.
Use when the user asks for repeated rollouts, marked decision processes, high-dimensional search, stochastic optimization, local-optima exploration, ensemble comparison, or recursive reasoning with a visible evidence trail.
Audits AI-implemented work for honest completion. Runs independent-evaluator checks against task artifacts, transcripts, tests, CI evidence, requirement-to-test mapping, status front matter, and quality gates; flags skipped tests, weakened assertions, mock-only confidence, snapshot drift, happy-path-only coverage, flaky retries, and status/evidence mismatches. Use when validating completed Compozy tasks, AI-authored PRs, or codex-loop iterations. Do not use for real-user QA, persona/journey testing, exploratory charters, or product usability sessions; use qa-execution for those.
Automated hypothesis generation and testing using large language models. Use this skill when generating scientific hypotheses from datasets, combining literature insights with empirical data, testing hypotheses against observational data, or conducting systematic hypothesis exploration for research discovery in domains like deception detection, AI content detection, mental health analysis, or other empirical research tasks.
Expert SwiftGen decisions for iOS/tvOS: when type-safe assets add value, template selection trade-offs, organization strategies, and build phase configuration. Use when setting up SwiftGen, choosing templates, or debugging generation issues. Trigger keywords: SwiftGen, type-safe, Asset, L10n, ImageAsset, ColorAsset, FontFamily, swiftgen.yml, structured-swift5, code generation, asset catalog
Uncertainty-aware non-linear reasoning system with recursive subagent orchestration. Triggers for complex reasoning, research, multi-domain synthesis, or when explicit commands `/nlr`, `/reason`, `/think-deep` are used. Integrates think skill (reasoning), agent-core skill (acting), and MCP tools (infranodus, exa, scholar-gateway) in recursive think→act→observe loops. Uses coding sandbox for execution validation and maintains deliberate noisiness via NoisyGraph scaffold. Supports `/compact` mode for abbreviated outputs and `/semantic` mode for rich exploration.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "use the oracle" or "ask the oracle" for deep research, analysis, or architectural questions. The oracle excels at multi-source research combining codebase exploration and web searches, then synthesizing findings into actionable answers. Use for complex questions requiring investigation across multiple sources, architectural analysis, refactoring plans, debugging mysteries, and code reviews.
Illustre automatiquement le journal d'une aventure BFRPG en générant des images pour les moments clés (combats, explorations, découvertes). Utilise la génération parallèle pour une performance optimale.
Deep web research with parallel investigators, multi-wave exploration, and structured synthesis. Spawns multiple web-researcher agents to explore different facets of a topic simultaneously, launches additional waves when gaps are identified, then synthesizes findings. Use when asked to research, investigate, compare options, find best practices, or gather comprehensive information from the web.\n\nThoroughness: quick for factual lookups | medium for focused topics | thorough for comparisons/evaluations (waves continue while critical gaps remain) | very-thorough for comprehensive research (waves continue until satisficed). Auto-selects if not specified.