Loading...
Loading...
Found 11,932 Skills
Sets up an `## Agent skills` block in AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md and `docs/agents/` so the engineering skills know this repo's issue tracker (GitHub or local markdown), triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run before first use of `to-issues`, `to-prd`, `triage`, `diagnose`, `tdd`, `improve-codebase-architecture`, or `zoom-out` — or if those skills appear to be missing context about the issue tracker, triage labels, or domain docs.
AFK adversarial code-review loop: Cursor agent CLI critic (grug + thermo-nuclear) produces structured findings; Codex validator confirms or pushbacks on regression risk; parent adjudicates and commits fixes per finding until clean. Config at ~/.config/adversarial-review/config.toml. Use for adversarial review, clean code loop, or unattended branch hardening.
Find the right Deepgram documentation for any task. Use whenever someone needs help locating docs, understanding which API to use, or wants to ask questions about Deepgram. Covers all product areas: speech-to-text, text-to-speech, voice agents, audio intelligence, and self-hosted deployments.
Hand off the current task to the SLICC browser agent, or install a new skill into SLICC from a GitHub repo. Use this skill when the user says things like "handoff to slicc", "move this to slicc", "move to the browser", "test in the browser", "handoff to browser", "install this skill in slicc", "upskill slicc with this repo", "add this skill to slicc", or otherwise asks you to continue the work inside the SLICC browser agent.
Helps users discover and install capabilities from the open agent skills ecosystem. Use when users ask "how do I do X" for specialized tasks, request "find a skill for X", want to extend agent capabilities, or need help with specific domains (testing, design, deployment, etc.).
RLM-style large-codebase comprehension — build a mental map of any codebase by dispatching sub-agents to explore regions without bloating main context
Diagnose a recurring failure (STUCK task, clustered CI error, frequent reverts) by dispatching sub-agents to digest CI logs without bloating main context. Returns one root-cause diagnosis.
Multi-source research synthesis — aggregate and compare 3+ sources or any source >5KB using sub-agent dispatch and SharedState
Install a per-turn canary signal (e.g. starting every reply with the user's name and a turn counter) so silent context degradation becomes visible the moment it happens, and run a recovery protocol when the canary trips. Use when the user mentions a "canary", "context canary", or "canary check", asks to detect context rot / compaction / drift, says "you stopped using my name" or "did you lose context", asks "how degraded is your context", or wants an early-warning system for long agent sessions.
Share markdown reports to the user's configured Slack agent_cli_report channel via Fastfold API, and persist the markdown as a library item.
A shared, file-based town square where multiple coding agents talk, coordinate, and debate — no server required. Use whenever more than one agent works the same repo (parallel Claude Code or Codex sessions, separate git worktrees, a fleet splitting a task) and they must stay out of each other's way or think together. TRIGGER on phrasings like "coordinate with the other agent/session", "post to / check the agora", "ask the other agents", "leave a message for whoever's working on X", "announce what files you're touching", "is anyone else editing this?", or any time you're about to edit shared code while other agents are live. Also trigger when an agent is stuck and wants a peer's second opinion, or when several agents each drafted a design (an API, a schema, an architecture) and the group needs to compare the proposals and converge on the best one. Works for any agent that can run a Python script, not just Claude Code.
Run a two-agent code review: spawn two fresh, clean-context agents that examine the SAME committed branch diff in parallel. One agent runs Codex's native `codex review --base` command, while the other independently reviews the code against Google's "What to look for in a code review" guidance. Merge both outputs into one agreement-ranked report. Use this whenever the user asks for "review-all", a second-opinion review, a dual review, a cross-check before a PR, or a maximum-confidence review of committed branch changes. Do not use it to APPLY fixes; it is review-only.