Loading...
Loading...
Found 33 Skills
Orchestrate subagent workflows for complex tasks that benefit from decomposition, role-based delegation, and parallel execution. Use when Codex should assemble a temporary team of subagents, choose roles from a reusable role library, create a controlled fallback role when no preset role fits, coordinate read-heavy work in parallel, or handle write-heavy work with ownership boundaries, staged execution, and an integrator-led merge path.
Design exploration with parallel agents. Use when brainstorming ideas, exploring solutions, or comparing alternatives.
Coordinate Claude Code Agent Teams through filesystem-based protocol. Use when orchestrating multiple Claude agents on parallel tasks, need task dependency management, multi-agent code review or implementation. Do not use when single-agent work suffices, task is not parallelizable.
Configure and orchestrate Claude Code agent teams (TeamCreate, SendMessage, TaskUpdate workflow). Use when you need multiple agents working in parallel on a complex task, want to coordinate background agents with messaging, or are setting up a lead/teammate architecture with a shared task list. Teams are experimental — enable with --enable-teams flag.
Richard Feynman's Integrity Audit applied to any analysis, business plan, or decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Source Auditor, Self-Deception Hunter, Translation Tester, Cargo Cult Inspector, Confidence Inverter — who each apply a distinct lens from Feynman's framework to detect dishonesty, self-deception, and cargo cult reasoning. The lead synthesizes into a verdict: is this analysis honest, or is it fooling itself? Use when the user says "feynman this", "integrity audit", "is this honest", "am I fooling myself", "cargo cult check", or wants to stress-test any analysis, plan, or claim before trusting it. Works standalone or as a meta-audit after /munger or /thiel.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "팀 구성해줘", "team assemble", "전문가 팀으로 해줘", "팀으로 해줘", "swarm", "병렬로 전문가 팀", or wants to decompose a complex task into specialist roles executed via TeamCreate. Also triggers when user describes a task clearly benefiting from parallel expert execution.
Multi-agent coordination discipline: one-message-then-wait (send complete context, wait for reply before sending again), idle notifications are heartbeats (no action unless extended + blocking + user asked), no polling loops (event-driven only), never fabricate agent responses (wait for real system events), sequential agent spawning (acknowledge between each), and proper shutdown protocol (request, wait, respect rejection). Activate when orchestrating multiple agents, managing agent teams, coordinating handoffs between agents, spawning subagents, or building multi-agent workflows. Triggers on: "coordinate agents", "spawn multiple agents", "manage agent team", "agent keeps sending messages", "polling loop", "agent idle", "shut down agent", "multi-agent workflow", "agent handoff", "coordinate parallel work", "stop bothering the other agent". Also relevant when an agent is fabricating responses, sending follow-up messages before replies arrive, or reacting to idle notifications unnecessarily.
Annie Duke's Decision Quality framework applied to a business decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Resulting Auditor, Calibrator, Pre-Mortem Analyst, Quit Strategist, Process Architect — who each apply a distinct lens from Duke's framework to evaluate whether a decision is sound regardless of outcome. The lead synthesizes into a stacking analysis: which biases are operating, which process flaws exist, and the honest Duke verdict. Use when the user says "duke this", "is this a good bet", "should I quit", "evaluate this decision", or faces any high-stakes choice under uncertainty and wants rigorous decision-process analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
[BETA] Execute work plans with external delegate support. Same as ce:work but includes experimental Codex delegation mode for token-conserving code implementation.