Loading...
Loading...
Found 38 Skills
Reads open review comments from a GitHub PR, triages them, applies code fixes, and drafts reply messages. Use when user wants to address PR comments, says 'address review comments', 'fix PR feedback', 'handle PR comments', 'respond to review', or mentions addressing code review feedback on a pull request.
Zero-ceremony inline execution for tasks completable in 3 or fewer file edits. No plan, no subagent, no research — just understand, do, commit, log. Use for "quick fix", "typo fix", "one-line change", "trivial fix", "rename this variable", "update this value", "fix this import". Do NOT use for tasks requiring research, planning, new dependencies, or more than 3 file edits — redirect to /quick instead.
Read open review comments and resolve them by making code fixes
사용자가 한 행동, 실제 결과와 원하는 결과를 바탕으로 현재 프로젝트의 문제를 재현하고 원인을 수정한다. “A를 했는데 B가 됐어”, “오류가 나”, “로컬에서는 되는데 배포하면 안 돼”, “데이터가 저장되지 않아”, “고쳐줘”처럼 기대와 다른 동작을 바로잡는 요청에 사용한다. 원인을 수정하지 않고 이전 상태로 되돌리기만 하는 요청에는 사용하지 않는다.
Guide for using ruff, the extremely fast Python linter and formatter. Use this when linting, formatting, or fixing Python code.
Weed the Allium garden. Find where Allium specifications and implementation code have diverged, and help resolve the divergences. Use when the user wants to check spec-code alignment, compare specs against implementation, audit for spec drift or violations, sync specs with code or code with specs, or verify whether the implementation matches what the spec says.
Implements the minimal code change identified by the om-root-cause step, adds regression tests, and runs the configured validation gate. Claims the tracker issue at start (assignee + in-progress label + claim comment) so concurrent automation backs off. Does not commit, push, or open a PR — that is the om-open-pr step's job.
Request coding agents to review code, verify review results and fix confirmed issues
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over the current branch's changes until a PR review comes back clean, scoped mechanically to the directories the branch touched. Reviews are performed by an installed PR-review skill (default: pr-review-toolkit's review-pr). Use to fix review findings on a branch before opening or updating a pull request ('clean up this branch', 'fix this PR until review passes', 'run review-and-fix on my changes'). NOT for a one-time review — run the PR-review skill directly.
Read open comments from the tree browser and resolve them by making code fixes
Multi-agent review-and-improve loop for a GitHub PR you have checked out — posts a "starting" PR comment cc'ing the original author, runs requested rounds plus any adaptive continuation, applies fix commits to the local branch after each round, pushes everything back to the PR, then edits the starting comment in-place with the synthesized report (or a failure summary). Auto-detects the PR from the currently checked-out branch when no locator is supplied. Use when the user wants to "improve a PR", "review and commit fixes", "iterate on my PR", or "review and push back" against a checked-out PR branch. Requires `gh`, `uuidgen`, `jq`, and `uv` or `python3` on PATH. Activates the `review-anvil` engine in per_fix mode.
Trace bugs and manual fixes back to kits and prompts; fix at the source so the iteration loop can reproduce the fix autonomously. Six-step revision process plus the single-failure backpropagation protocol. Use when a manual hot-fix has been applied, when convergence stalls, or when the same class of bug keeps reappearing.