Loading...
Loading...
Found 40 Skills
Execute a micro-level Flutter code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, architecture, and code implementation. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check Flutter code quality, validate best practices, or review code standards compliance. Triggers on: 'flutter best practices', 'code quality', 'code review', 'flutter standards', 'architecture compliance', 'testing quality'.
Master Git hooks setup with Husky, lint-staged, pre-commit framework, and commitlint. Automate code quality gates, formatting, linting, and commit message enforcement before code reaches CI.
Research-to-implement pipeline chaining 5 MCP tools with graceful degradation
Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback. Covers documentation requirements, DESCRIPTION field standards, URL validation, examples, and administrative requirements.
Run shellcheck and actionlint on shell scripts and GitHub Actions workflows. Use before pushing or when fixing lint issues.
Search code by AST structure using ast-grep. Find semantic patterns like function calls, imports, class definitions instead of text patterns. Triggers on: find all calls to X, search for pattern, refactor usages, find where function is used, structural search, ast-grep, sg.
Run Warden to analyze code changes before committing. Use when asked to "run warden", "check my changes", "review before commit", "warden config", "warden.toml", "create a warden skill", "add trigger", or any Warden-related local development task.
Use before committing code - validates Drupal coding standards, SOLID/DRY principles, security practices, and CSS standards
Review RTK Rust code for idiomatic simplification. Detects over-engineering, unnecessary allocations, verbose patterns. Applies Rust idioms without changing behavior.
Use this skill when posting the final summary comment after all inline comments are posted. Apply as the LAST step of code review after all findings are classified and inline comments are complete. Detects context (GitHub sticky comment, new comment, or local file) and routes output accordingly.
Provides reflective questioning framework to challenge assumptions about work completeness, catching incomplete implementations before they're marked "done". Use before claiming features complete, before moving ADRs to completed status, during self-review, or when declaring work finished. Triggers on "is this really done", "self-review my work", "challenge my assumptions", "verify completeness", or proactively before marking tasks complete. Works with any type of implementation work. Enforces critical thinking about integration, testing, and execution proof.
Scans code against 17 named design smells and produces a structured diagnostic report. Use when reviewing a PR for design quality, evaluating unfamiliar code against a comprehensive checklist or when the user asks for a red flags scan. Not for diagnosing why code feels complex (use complexity-recognition) or evaluating whether a PR maintains design trajectory (use code-evolution).