Loading...
Loading...
Found 794 Skills
Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm
Use when another skill or agent needs a review panel assembled, retained, or converged — invoked by /review-loop, /plan-review, and code-reviewer, not directly by users.
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
Generates a daily standup post from GitHub activity and agent session history, and posts it to the mitodl/hq Check-ins discussion. Use when asked to write, generate, or post a daily standup — fetches PR, issue, and code-review activity via the gh CLI, queries recent agent sessions, asks clarifying questions about timing and off-GitHub work, renders the standup in the team's standard format, and posts it as a discussion comment with user confirmation.
Luban - Skill Polishing Workshop. Transform a "usable Skill" into a public Skill asset that is "understandable, installable, shareable, verifiable, and continuously evolvable". The methodology consists of five craftsman-like steps: 1. Material Inspection: First challenge whether the premise of this Skill is valid; directly state if the "material" is not worth polishing. 2. Peer Research: Search for similar Skills online to clarify its position in the ecosystem. 3. Dimension Measurement: Evaluate using three metrics - structure, actual testing, and live verification (live verification means reconciling with real running outputs; a green CI can be deceptive). 4. Iterative Refinement: Freeze the original version as a baseline; only retain changes that pass the verification gate, otherwise revert. Try to institutionalize verification methods as tools and rules in the repository. 5. Post-Release Iteration: Release is not the end; maintain a benchmark observation list, and start the next iteration based on real feedback. This tool is used when users want to upgrade, optimize, polish, productize, or release their self-developed Skills. The final deliverables include a structured Skill Polishing Report, directly replaceable rewritten segments, and a shareable "Graduation Certificate" result card that can be screenshot. Trigger phrases include but are not limited to: "Let Luban take a look at this skill", "Polish at Luban's Workshop", "Polish my skill", "Upgrade my skill", "Optimize this skill", "Skill check-up", "Skill audit", "Productize my skill", "How to release this skill", "Benchmark against similar skills", "Why no one installs my skill", "Help me publish my skill to GitHub/ClawHub", "Improve SKILL.md". Even if users only provide a Skill directory, GitHub repository link, or a segment of SKILL.md saying "Help me figure out how to modify it", it should be triggered as long as the context is about making the Skill more usable and shareable. Do NOT use this for creating a new Skill from scratch (use skill-creator), regular code review (use code-review), or rewriting ordinary prompts unrelated to Skill assets.
(NS) Senior Tech Lead code review on SOLID, clean code, performance, security, and testability. Use proactively after writing or modifying code, before opening PRs, after implementation closure, or when the user asks for a code review, PR review, or issue review gate — even if they do not name this skill. For GitLab issue execution with ISSUE_URL, use Issue review mode. Do NOT write code-review-report.md. Do NOT use for root-cause debugging (use ns-investigator).
Dispatch code-reviewer agent for two-stage review. Use after completing implementation tasks.
Git branching strategies, conflict resolution, rebase workflows, monorepo patterns, and advanced operations like cherry-pick, bisect, and reflog recovery. Activate on "git", "branching strategy", "merge conflict", "rebase", "cherry-pick", "monorepo git", "git bisect", "git reflog", "squash commits". NOT for GitHub Actions CI/CD (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), GitHub API/webhooks, or PR review processes (use code-review-checklist).
Claude Code Command Selection Guide - Automatically recommend and select the right commands, agents, and skills in Claude Code. Use when: (1) user is unsure which command or tool to use, (2) needs to decide which agent/skill best fits the current task, (3) querying usage scenarios for /plan, /tdd, /compact, /loop and other commands, (4) understanding when to invoke planner, code-reviewer, build-error-resolver and other agents, (5) needs command cheat sheet or decision flowchart. Triggers: "which command to use", "which agent", "command selection", "how to use /plan", "when to use /compact", "agent selection guide", "command cheat sheet", "skill recommendation".
AFK adversarial code-review loop: Cursor agent CLI critic (grug + thermo-nuclear) produces structured findings; Codex validator confirms or pushbacks on regression risk; parent adjudicates and commits fixes per finding until clean. Config at ~/.config/adversarial-review/config.toml. Use for adversarial review, clean code loop, or unattended branch hardening.
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREMELY CRITICAL 6-pass analysis identifying runtime failures, code consistency issues, architectural problems, environment compatibility risks, and verification strategies. Posts structured review as GitHub PR comment. Use when user asks to "review PR", "review this code", "review changes", "check this PR", "analyze PR", "post review", or for Phase 3 of devflow. Supports parallel review mode with multiplier (code-review-3, code-review 6X) for consensus-based reviews. This is an ultra-critical reviewer that does not let things slip and desires only perfection.
Creates or audits a Claude Code subagent file. Use when user says 'create an agent', 'build a subagent', 'review this agent', 'audit our agents', 'add a code-reviewer agent', or 'our agents are too broad'. Do NOT use for skills (use create-or-audit-skill), hooks (use create-or-audit-hook), or CLAUDE.md files (use create-or-audit-claude-md).