Loading...
Loading...
Found 41 Skills
Claude + Gemini Cross Fact-Checking. Conduct independent checks by three parties: Opus itself, Gemini Flash, and Gemini Pro → extract issues → discuss → output a consensus report.
Cross fact-checking with 4 models: Claude + Gemini + Codex. Conduct independent checks with Opus itself, Gemini Flash, Gemini Pro, and Codex (gpt-5.3-codex) → extract issues → discuss → output a consensus report.
Verify statistics from raw data with methodology checking, significance testing, claim validation, and bias detection. Use when fact-checking statistical claims, validating research findings, or auditing data analysis.
AI-optimized web search using Tavily Search API. Use when you need comprehensive web research, current events lookup, domain-specific search, or AI-generated answer summaries. Tavily is optimized for LLM consumption with clean structured results, answer generation, and raw content extraction. Best for research tasks, news queries, fact-checking, and gathering authoritative sources.
Search the web for information using DuckDuckGo or other search engines via curl. Use when users ask questions requiring up-to-date information, research, or fact-checking.
Skill for optimizing article style to remove AI flavor. Used to identify and rewrite issues such as AI traces, template tone, material-like style, translationese, empty buzzwords, excessive golden sentences, overuse of em dashes, bullet stacking, and random bolding in articles, official account drafts, self-media drafts, oral broadcast scripts, speech scripts, course scripts, and product copy; activated when users say phrases like "remove AI flavor", "eliminate AI traces", "not written by AI", "more human-written", "more natural", "less robotic", "remove template feel", "polish to official account final draft". Not applicable for fact-checking, zero-based topic planning, converting papers to official account articles, pure title generation, or pursuing AI detector pass rates.
Analyzes events through journalistic lens using 5 Ws and H, investigative methods, source evaluation, fact-checking, newsworthiness criteria, and ethical journalism principles. Provides insights on story angles, information gaps, credibility, public interest, and media framing. Use when: Breaking news, information verification, source analysis, story development, media criticism. Evaluates: Factual accuracy, source credibility, completeness, newsworthiness, bias, public interest.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
News Briefing + Verification Workflow. This workflow applies when users request news, headlines, daily briefings, "today's news", "latest updates", breaking news, or specific current figures/events that demand reliable sources and timestamps. Source links and local publication time are mandatory; NEVER fabricate any content.
Detects fabricated content, false citations, and unverifiable claims in agent outputs. Uses source verification and consistency checking. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).
Evaluate source credibility using primary/secondary classification, internal/external criticism, triangulation, and misinformation detection. Use this skill when the user needs to assess whether information is trustworthy, evaluate research sources, fact-check claims, or detect misinformation — even if they say 'can I trust this source', 'is this real', 'how reliable is this data', or 'fact-check this for me'.
Analyze arguments, detect biases, evaluate claims, and improve reasoning. Use when asked to fact-check, identify logical fallacies, evaluate arguments, analyze predictions, find root causes, or think adversarially about plans. Triggers include "evaluate this argument", "logical fallacies", "fact check", "analyze the claims", "identify biases", "devil's advocate", "red team this", "root cause".