Loading...
Loading...
Found 39 Skills
Determine if proposed changes require an RFC. Use when planning significant changes, before starting major work, or when asked whether an RFC is needed.
Use when OpenSpec artifacts have been generated by /opsx:propose and need review before implementation begins — validates proposal scope, spec completeness, design decisions, and task executability
Use when evaluating ideas in voting phase. Be aggressive - score misaligned or poor ideas low enough to veto, score weak proposals below approval, score strong aligned ideas high. First check directive, then vote.
Use when creating or amending a Spec Kit project constitution, especially when `memory/constitution.md` is missing, contains `[PLACEHOLDER]` tokens, or principle changes must be propagated to planning/spec/task templates.
Conduct stakeholder analysis using identification, Power-Interest matrix classification, and influence strategy development. Use this skill when the user needs to map stakeholders for a project, manage conflicting interests, prioritize communication, or build a stakeholder engagement plan — even if they say 'who needs to approve this', 'how do I get buy-in', or 'who might block this project'.
Create stakeholder alignment artifacts including responsibility matrices, decision frameworks, and communication plans.
Phase 1 of the feature workflow — Draft a design document for the new feature, serving as the sole input for subsequent implementation and acceptance. First gather evidence (read architecture docs, review relevant code, grep to prevent term conflicts, check archives), then write a complete first draft in one go (including YAML frontmatter + three-tier structure + test design), submit it to the user for overall review, and iterate until approval. After approval, extract {slug}-checklist.yaml from {slug}-design.md for use in the next two phases. Trigger scenarios: "Start designing the solution", "Write design doc", "Prepare to implement XX", with the prerequisite that you already know what to do, who it's for, and how to define success.
Audit design documents for missing decisions, compatibility risks, rollout gaps, and observability omissions. Use whenever the user asks to review a design doc, architecture proposal, implementation-facing design, plan, or design-adjacent markdown file for completeness, migration strategy, rollback, data handling, or suggested additions without directly editing the document. Also trigger on short requests such as `review <file>.md` or `audit <file>.md` when the target looks like a design, plan, architecture, proposal, or decision document.
Use when you find additional work needed during task execution that's not in the original task description, to report it to ZŌE for review
Generate a requirements-quality checklist for an OpenSpec change and run it against the proposal/design/tasks/delta — validating completeness, clarity, consistency, and testability BEFORE you approve the spec. Modeled on GitHub Spec-Kit's /checklist. Use when reviewing a spec at the human approval gate, or before launching implementation, to catch under-specified requirements early.
Amend an existing plan file — add tasks, modify pending or delegated tasks, and mark completed tasks that are invalidated by the change as [>] (needs re-run). Walks through analysis, cascading impact, and user confirmation before touching the file. When memory (wiki substrate) exists, it may also preserve durable amendment findings there. Reports goal impact and routes intent, boundaries, or validation changes to loam::setting-goals.
Use to coordinate approvals, communications, and accountability across teams for feedback programs.