Loading...
Loading...
Found 31 Skills
Scans code against 17 named design smells and produces a structured diagnostic report. Use when reviewing a PR for design quality, evaluating unfamiliar code against a comprehensive checklist or when the user asks for a red flags scan. Not for diagnosing why code feels complex (use complexity-recognition) or evaluating whether a PR maintains design trajectory (use code-evolution).
Agent skill for pseudocode - invoke with $agent-pseudocode
Audit code for testability design patterns. Identifies business logic entangled with IO, hard-coded dependencies, and mocking friction. Suggests functional core / imperative shell separation. Read-only analysis. Triggers: review testability, testable code, mocking issues, dependency injection.
Opinionated guide to software design principles and architectural patterns. Use when reviewing code design, planning feature architecture, asking "is this the right design?", "how should I structure this?", or requesting design philosophy guidance. Triggers on questions about SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, Clean Architecture, DDD, hexagonal architecture, composition vs inheritance, coupling, cohesion, or any software design trade-off discussion.
Proxy2.0 API 接口设计规范：RESTful URL 约定、Controller 模板、VO 设计、Swagger 文档注解、 错误码设计、响应格式。Use when: (1) Creating new Controller/API endpoints, (2) Designing VO classes (PageReqVO/SaveReqVO/RespVO), (3) Writing Swagger annotations, (4) Defining error codes, (5) Reviewing API design compliance.
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
Optional design-improvement pass for when you have spare usage to drain. Finds the shallowest modules in the code the spec touches, researches a deeper design, and proposes refactors that shrink interfaces and hide decisions — behavior held constant, tests green before and after. Proposes §I/§V/§T edits, never silent rewrites. Triggers when the user says "deepen this", "improve the design", "this module feels shallow", "pull complexity down", "use spare budget on the codebase", or invokes /ck:deepen. Leans on the codebase-design skill's deep-module vocabulary when present.