Loading...
Loading...
Found 110 Skills
Build AdonisJS 6 features from scratch through production. Full lifecycle - build, debug, test, optimize, refactor. Follows TypeScript-first, Lucid ORM, and AdonisJS conventions.
Use before claiming work is complete, fixed, or tested; before committing or creating a PR — you must run verification commands and confirm the output before claiming success; always back up assertions with evidence
Verification-ladder R5 review dimension: the mutation-adequacy adequacy backstop. Runs the diff-scoped mutation gate, reads the carrier, and turns surviving / NoCoverage mutants into concrete 'write a test that kills <file>:<line>' follow-ups. Triggers: 'mutation adequacy', 'check mutation score', or /review on a HIGH-tier feature. The mutation SCORE is advisory by default (a config override is needed to block on it). The NoCoverage axis has its own real, functioning block-mode enforcement path under review.mutationEnforcement: block (default budget: 0 uncovered changed lines) — opt-in, same as the score's severity. The diff-scoped CI wiring runs in observe mode unconditionally pending a clean runner verdict; it is not yet a blocking CI backstop. Do NOT run full-tree mutation here (scope:'full' is deferred to R10/v2.12).
Turns implementation work into working code, reviewed and verified. Use when the user delegates a feature, story, bug fix, or meaningful change; a bare story or issue link counts. Skip obvious, low-risk mechanical maintenance such as small ignore-file, typo-only, formatting-only, or configuration-hygiene edits. Explicit BMAD requests always qualify. Do not volunteer for user-directed interactive edits or version-control operations that only record existing work.
Intelligently upgrade npm dependencies with breaking change research for major version updates. Use when the user asks to "update dependencies", "upgrade npm packages", "check for updates", or "update npm deps".
Read-only drift detector. Diffs SPEC.md against current code and reports violations grouped by severity. Writes nothing — suggests remedies via the spec or build skills but never invokes them. Triggers when the user asks to check drift, audit the spec, verify invariants, or ask whether code still matches the spec. Phrasings: "check drift", "audit the spec", "does the code still match §V", "check invariants", "spec vs code".
Use when a spec or requirements need a durable, multi-step implementation plan before code changes begin
Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success. Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs.
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "/aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
TDD Skill for Team Workflows (Phase 3). Before writing any implementation code, you must first write a failing test and verify the failure, then write the minimal implementation until it passes, and finally refactor and re-test.
Execute a GRACE development plan in controller-managed parallel waves with selectable safety profiles, batched graph sync, and scoped reviews.
Verify your own completed code changes using the repo's existing infrastructure and an independent evaluator context. Use after implementing a change when you need to run unit or integration tests, check build or lint gates, prove the real surface works with evidence, and challenge the changed code for clarity, deduplication, and maintainability. If the repo is not verifiable yet, hand off to `agent-readiness`; if you are reviewing someone else's code, use `review`.