Loading...
Loading...
Found 64 Skills
Assemble a panel of experts to assess a problem from multiple professional perspectives, surface agreement and disagreement, and deliver a chaired recommendation with clear tradeoffs. Use when the user wants multi-expert judgment, a second opinion, design critique, option comparison, or a recommendation backed by distinct expert viewpoints.
Use when facing complex decisions, architectural trade-offs, philosophical questions, or any problem requiring deep analysis before action. Use when the user asks to "think deeply", "question assumptions", "analyze from first principles", "challenge this decision", debates between two approaches (e.g. monolith vs microservices, build vs buy, SSR vs CSR), or invokes /socrates. Also triggered when other skills need a thinking engine for rigorous pre-analysis. Even if the problem seems simple, if there are hidden assumptions worth examining, this skill applies.
Interpret macroeconomic indicators including GDP, inflation, unemployment, interest rates, and exchange rates to assess economic health and predict trends. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate a country's economic outlook, understand monetary/fiscal policy impacts, or contextualize business decisions within the macroeconomic environment — even if they say 'is the economy doing well', 'what do rising interest rates mean for us', or 'explain today's economic data'.
Charlie Munger's Mental Lattice applied to a business idea. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Mathematician, Psychologist, Inverter, Economist, Moat Analyst — who each apply their discipline's elementary models to the idea. The lead synthesizes into a lollapalooza analysis: which forces stack, which fight you, and the honest Munger verdict. Use when the user says "munger this", "apply the lattice", "what would Charlie think", or proposes a business idea and wants multidisciplinary analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
Query schelling.sh for recurring, decision-shaped problems. Retrieve defaults and risks from prior cases, then attach durable follow-up learning. Works for Markdown deliverables when memory should steer decisions. Needs network.
Multi-framework intelligence brief. Takes any business situation, investment thesis, career decision, or strategic problem and runs it through 4-7 of 11 analytical frameworks (Feynman, Kahneman, Shannon, Tetlock, Duke, Munger, Thiel, Helmer, Christensen, Meadows, Taleb, Bezos). Each framework runs as a distinct sub-analysis producing concrete claims. Contradictions between analyses are surfaced explicitly. Synthesizes into a single brief: Core Argument, Key Insight, load-bearing conditions, failure modes with numeric probabilities, validation tests, recommended action with sizing, and the strongest dissent. Use when the user says "think through this", "analyze this for me", "help me decide", "think", "/think", or presents any complex decision, investment thesis, business question, or strategic problem that warrants structured multi-framework analysis.
Evidence-based Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) assessment skill modeled after the Micromedex Drug-Reax methodology. Trigger this skill whenever the user types /drug-drug, mentions "drug interaction", "DDI", "drug-drug", "can I take X with Y", "interaction between", "交互作用", "併用", or asks whether two medications can be used together. This skill performs systematic literature retrieval via PubMed, CrossRef, and WebSearch, then produces a structured assessment report with Severity, Documentation, Onset, Mechanism, Clinical Effects, and Management — mirroring the Micromedex Drug-Reax classification framework. Even casual questions like "is it safe to combine A and B" should trigger this skill.
Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.
Generate and evaluate solution options
Multi-agent discussion rooms — debate or poll a problem from multiple perspectives. Standalone or invoked by other skills as a sub-routine. Mode=debate: N agents argue in rounds, converge. Mode=poll: N agents independently analyze, aggregate by consensus. Not for implementation (use system-architecture). Not for verification (use review-chain). For clarifying requirements first, see discover. For decomposing work after a decision, see task-breakdown.
What-if scenario analyzer for sports. Play-calling recommendations, clock management, substitution patterns, risk/reward calculations.
Comprehensive drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction and risk assessment. Analyzes interaction mechanisms (CYP450, transporters, pharmacodynamic), severity classification, clinical evidence grading, and provides management strategies. Supports single drug pairs, polypharmacy analysis (3+ drugs), and alternative drug recommendations. Use when users ask about drug interactions, medication safety, polypharmacy risks, or need DDI assessment for clinical decision support.