Loading...
Loading...
Found 48 Skills
Use this skill when a design or idea requires higher confidence, risk reduction, or formal review. This skill orchestrates a structured, sequential multi-agent design review where each agent has a strict, non-overlapping role. It prevents blind spots, false confidence, and premature convergence.
Run the full design-to-build workflow as a guided sequence. Orchestrates all designer skills in order, from grilling through review. Use when user wants to go through the complete design process, start a project from scratch, run the full flow, or mentions "design flow" or "full workflow".
Interroge l'utilisateur sans relâche sur un plan ou un design jusqu'à atteindre une compréhension partagée, en résolvant chaque branche de l'arbre de décision. À utiliser quand l'utilisateur veut stress-tester un plan, se faire challenger sur son design, ou mentionne « grill me » / « interroge-moi » / « challenge-moi » / « questionne-moi ».
Critique UI/UX designs for clarity, hierarchy, interaction, accessibility, and craft. Use for design reviews, PR feedback on UI changes, evaluating mockups, checking if a component is ship-ready, or when honest feedback is needed on whether something meets a high bar.
Set up the Inflight feedback widget, authenticate with the CLI, and share staging URLs for design review. Use when the user wants to collect design feedback, add Inflight to a project, or share a staging deployment for review.
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "ask me questions".
Pencil Design Skill for Team Workflows (Phase 2). Produce design.pen (or declare no UI design) based on requirements and plans, and prepare G2 design review materials.
10-parallel code/design review using reviewer subagents. Use when: - Running code reviews on PRs, commits, or branches - Running design reviews on issues or documents - Need multi-perspective review (security, architecture, code, QA, historian)
Implement reviewer feedback on a Canva design. Reads all comment threads, synthesises what reviewers want, makes the clear-cut changes directly, and flags anything that needs a human decision. Use when the user asks to "implement feedback on my deck", "address comments on a design", "apply review feedback", "fix the comments on my presentation", or "implement the feedback".
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
Audit design documents for missing decisions, compatibility risks, rollout gaps, and observability omissions. Use whenever the user asks to review a design doc, architecture proposal, implementation-facing design, plan, or design-adjacent markdown file for completeness, migration strategy, rollback, data handling, or suggested additions without directly editing the document. Also trigger on short requests such as `review <file>.md` or `audit <file>.md` when the target looks like a design, plan, architecture, proposal, or decision document.
Use vision models to self-review screenshots against design intent. Catches spacing issues, alignment problems, color inconsistencies, responsive bugs, and accessibility gaps. Use when reviewing designs, comparing implementations to mockups, or doing pre-ship QA.