Loading...
Loading...
Found 27 Skills
Constructive critique through 5 HackerNews commenter personas with evidence-based claim validation. Use when user wants devil's advocacy, stress testing, or critical review of ideas, docs, architecture, or code. Use for "roast", "critique this", "poke holes", "devil's advocate", "stress test", or "what's wrong with". Do NOT use for code review (use systematic-code-review), implementation changes, or performance profiling without a specific critique request.
Check the consistency and authenticity risks of citations and references in NSFC proposal text (read-only): Verify the existence of bibkey, format issues such as BibTeX fields and DOI, and generate structured input for the host AI to evaluate item-by-item whether the text expression actually cites the literature; by default, only an audit report is output, and the proposal or .bib file is not directly modified (unless the user explicitly requests it).
Review and annotate documents/contracts — output annotated docx with comments or tracked changes. Core: contract review (risk clauses, rights imbalance, vague wording, missing clauses); also general document review (grammar, logic, formatting). 批阅文档/合同 — 审阅任意文档并以批注或修订模式输出带标注的 docx。 核心场景：合同/协议审查（风险条款、权利义务、模糊表述、缺失条款）， 也支持通用文档审阅（语法、逻辑、格式）。 Trigger when: user asks to "审阅", "批阅", "批注", "review", "审查合同", "review contract", "review agreement", "annotate document", "check contract", "合同审查", "文档批注", or provides a document (.docx) for review.