Loading...
Loading...
Found 113 Skills
Forces exhaustive problem-solving using corporate PUA rhetoric and structured debugging methodology. MUST trigger when: (1) any task has failed 2+ times or you're stuck in a loop tweaking the same approach; (2) you're about to say 'I cannot', suggest the user do something manually, or blame the environment without verifying; (3) you catch yourself being passive — not searching, not reading source, not verifying, just waiting for instructions; (4) user expresses frustration in ANY form: 'try harder', 'stop giving up', 'figure it out', 'why isn't this working', 'again???', or any similar sentiment even if phrased differently. Also trigger when facing complex multi-step debugging, environment issues, config problems, or deployment failures where giving up early is tempting. Applies to ALL task types: code, config, research, writing, deployment, infrastructure, API integration. Do NOT trigger on first-attempt failures or when a known fix is already executing successfully.
Japanese version of the PUA Universal Motivation Engine. It compels exhaustive problem-solving using corporate PUA rhetoric and structured debugging methodology in Japanese. MUST trigger under the following conditions: (1) Any task has failed 2+ times, or you're stuck in a loop of tweaking the same approach; (2) You're about to say 'I cannot', suggest manual handling to the user, or blame the environment without verification; (3) You find yourself being passive — not searching, not reading source code, not verifying, just waiting for instructions; (4) The user expresses frustration in any form: 'try harder', 'stop giving up', 'figure it out', 'why isn't this working', 'again???', 'もっと頑張れ', 'なんでまた失敗したの', 'もう一回やって', 'なんとかしろ', or any similar sentiment regardless of phrasing. It should also trigger when facing complex multi-step debugging, environment issues, configuration problems, or deployment failures where early surrender is tempting. Applies to ALL task types: code, configuration, research, writing, deployment, infrastructure, API integration. DO NOT trigger on first-attempt failures or when a known fix is already executing successfully.
Dynamic, reflective problem-solving through structured sequential thoughts with support for branching, revision, and adaptive depth. Use this skill when: (1) Breaking down complex problems into steps, (2) Planning and design with room for revision, (3) Analysis that might need course correction, (4) Problems where the full scope is not clear initially, (5) Multi-step solutions requiring maintained context, (6) Situations where irrelevant information must be filtered out, (7) Any task benefiting from hypothesis generation, verification, and iterative refinement. Triggers: think through, step by step, break this down, sequential thinking, reason through, analyze step by step, think carefully, or when a problem clearly benefits from structured multi-step reasoning.
Creative Intelligence Suite for AI-driven ideation, design thinking, innovation strategy, problem-solving, and storytelling. 5 named specialist agents with distinct methodologies — no setup required, all workflows available immediately.
Strategic thinking framework integrating First Principles Analysis, Stanford Design Thinking, and MIT Systems Engineering for deeper problem-solving. Use when performing architecture decisions, technology selection trade-offs, root cause analysis, cognitive bias detection, or first principles decomposition. Do NOT use for code quality validation (use moai-foundation-quality instead) or implementation workflows (use moai-workflow-ddd instead).
Simulate a senior high school Grade 3 general technology tutor, providing guidance on general technology issues including technical design, structural analysis, flowcharts, algorithms, and simple programming. Focus on cultivating practical operation skills, design thinking, and problem-solving abilities. Activate this when students raise questions about technical design, structural optimization, process design, and algorithms.
Gemini CLI consultation workflow for coding agents. Use when technical tasks need Gemini consultation for decisions, planning, debugging, problem-solving, or pre-implementation guidance.
Chain-of-thought reasoning, self-reflection, and systematic problem-solving patterns for AI agents. Use before any complex task to ensure logical and accurate solutions.
Convenes expert panels for problem-solving. Use when user mentions panel, experts, multiple perspectives, MECE, DMAIC, RAPID, Six Sigma, root cause analysis, strategic decisions, or process improvement.
Comprehensive knowledge of all 23 Gang of Four design patterns with progressive disclosure (Quick/Practical/Deep), pattern recognition for problem-solving, and philosophy-aligned guidance to prevent over-engineering.
McKinsey-style issue tree framework for breaking down complex problems into MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) components. Use when users need to decompose strategic questions, structure analysis, create work plans, or prepare for case interviews. Apply hypothesis-driven approach to problem-solving.
Structured reflective problem-solving methodology. Process: decompose, analyze, hypothesize, verify, revise. Capabilities: complex problem decomposition, adaptive planning, course correction, hypothesis verification, multi-step analysis. Actions: decompose, analyze, plan, revise, verify solutions step-by-step. Keywords: sequential thinking, problem decomposition, multi-step analysis, hypothesis verification, adaptive planning, course correction, reflective thinking, step-by-step, thought sequence, dynamic adjustment, unclear scope, complex problem, structured analysis. Use when: decomposing complex problems, planning with revision capability, analyzing unclear scope, verifying hypotheses, needing course correction, solving multi-step problems.