Loading...
Loading...
Found 522 Skills
Run a comprehensive pull request review using multiple specialized agents. Each agent focuses on a different aspect of code quality, such as comments, tests, error handling, type design, and general code review. The skill aggregates results and provides a clear action plan for improvements. Triggers include "review PR", "analyze pull request", "code review", and "PR quality check".
Use when conducting comprehensive code review for pull requests across multiple quality dimensions. Orchestrates 12-15 specialized reviewer agents across 4 phases using star topology coordination. Covers automated checks, parallel specialized reviews (quality, security, performance, architecture, documentation), integration analysis, and final merge recommendation in a 4-hour workflow.
Use this skill for pull request workflows - creating PRs (branch, commit, push, open), reviewing PRs (code quality, test coverage, issue fixing), or merging PRs (CI checks, merge, cleanup). Handles the complete PR lifecycle via gh CLI. Triggers included, "create PR", "open PR", "review PR", "merge PR".
Prepare a conventional branch, write or review a pull/merge request title and body, then push and create or update the GitHub PR. Use when work is ready for review or PR/MR copy needs drafting or review.
Turn finished local work into a commit, an ordinary pull request, or a stacked pull-request chain. Use when asked to commit, save changes, open or update a PR, publish a branch, create/sync/restack/submit a PR stack, or run /plate. Owns all staging, committing, pushing, PR creation, and stack-aware mutation. GitHub inspection, review, comments, CI, issues, releases, and repository administration remain /gh.
Designs and verifies the path a stranger walks to their first merged contribution on an open-source project - the CONTRIBUTING file, the good-first-issue queue, a clone-to-passing-tests command that works cold, and the first-pull-request review and recognition loop, scored against a blocking-plus-weighted rubric. Use whenever someone says "nobody contributes to my project", "write a CONTRIBUTING.md", "our good first issues get no takers", "first-time contributors disappear", "contributor onboarding", "first pull request experience", or "how do we get more open-source contributors" - even if they only complain about a lonely repo. Not triage-system design - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-issue-triage. Not governance or CLA choice.
Orchestrate and coordinate coding workers in Herdr by spawning parallel Codex workers in git worktree tabs, tracking status and reports, and routing owned task, review, and pull-request lifecycles. Use only when the request explicitly mentions Herdr and asks to orchestrate, coordinate, fan out, parallelize, delegate, or route work among coding workers — or a prompt tells you that you are a Herdr worker reporting to an orchestrator. Never use it merely because a task involves parallel work, multiple agents, or git worktrees without Herdr being named; also not for single-agent Herdr control or general Herdr CLI questions, which the herdr skill covers.
Diagnoses CI and pull-request pipeline health for a GitHub repo using the engineering analytics MCP tools — pull-requests (PR list with CI status), workflow-health (per-workflow CI trends), and pr-lifecycle (a single PR's timeline). Use when asked whether CI is getting faster or slower, which GitHub Actions workflow is the slow or flaky long-pole, how long PRs take from open to merge, how an author's merge time compares to the cohort, which open PRs have failing or pending CI, or where a specific pull request is stuck. Triggers on "engineering analytics", "is CI getting slower", "slow workflow", "flaky CI", "time to merge", "cycle time", "PR throughput", "failing checks", "where is PR <n> stuck", "CI long pole", "what's holding up this PR". For a verdict on one specific CI failure (whose fault, which commit) use investigating-ci-failures; to save these numbers as insights use turning-engineering-analytics-into-insights.
Audit open pull-request comments, fix and push the justified ones, and reply to and resolve each thread.
Use only when explicitly invoked by name. Create or audit CODEOWNERS, issue and pull-request templates, contribution policy, and repository governance files from provider rules. Excludes hosted settings mutations, CI pipelines, AGENTS.md, and general README work.
Orchestrate and coordinate coding workers in Herdr by spawning parallel Codex workers in git worktree tabs, tracking status, reconciling worker state before waiting, validating reports against raw results, processing queued reports before answering the user, correlating matching failures across streams, checking whether a constraint came from the user instruction, worker prompt, or orchestrator addition using transcript evidence, and routing task, review, and pull-request lifecycles. Use when a request mentions Herdr and asks to orchestrate, coordinate, delegate, route, reconcile state before waiting, process queued reports, correlate matching failures, explain a constraint's source, or validate worker reports, or when a prompt says you are a Herdr worker reporting to an orchestrator. Exclude single-pane or single-agent Herdr control, pane-output questions, general CLI questions, and parallel work or git worktrees without Herdr.
Audit or configure CodeRabbit repository review policy from effective sources. Use for CodeRabbit setup, configuration review, path coverage, or a specific pull-request review audit. Trigger on "configure CodeRabbit", "review .coderabbit.yaml", "set up CodeRabbit", "audit CodeRabbit settings", or "is CodeRabbit covering X". Keep audits read-only by default and separate schema validity, rule quality, and completed-review evidence. Do not use it to run a CodeRabbit CLI review or autofix, or to fix review comments on a pull request.