Loading...
Loading...
Found 145 Skills
Pragmatic qualitative analysis for interview data in sociology research. Guides you through systematic coding, interpretation, and synthesis with quality checkpoints. Supports theory-informed (Track A) or data-first (Track B) approaches.
Use when reviewing or scoring AI-generated unit tests/UT code, especially when coverage, assertion effectiveness, or test quality is in question and a numeric score, risk level, or must-fix checklist is needed
Assist developers in writing clean, maintainable code following software engineering best practices. Use when conducting code reviews, refactoring code, enforcing coding standards, seeking guidance on clean code principles, or integrating automated quality checks into development workflows.
Audit Lightning Web Components for SLDS compliance and produce a scored quality report. Runs the SLDS linter, analyzes CSS for theming hook usage and pairing, checks HTML for accessibility attributes, and scores findings across categories into an overall grade. Use when asked to "score my component", "SLDS scorecard", "quality report", "audit SLDS compliance", "how good is my SLDS", "check component quality", "rate my component", "evaluate my component", "is this component ready to ship?", "look at my LWC for issues", "audit this before I submit", "review my component before code review", or any time a user wants a quality assessment or production-readiness check on an LWC or SLDS component. Not for fixing violations (use uplifting-components-to-slds2) or building new components (use applying-slds).
Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.
AI-powered systematic codebase analysis. Combines mechanical structure extraction with Claude's semantic understanding to produce documentation that captures not just WHAT code does, but WHY it exists and HOW it fits into the system. Includes pattern recognition, red flag detection, flow tracing, and quality assessment. Use for codebase analysis, documentation generation, architecture understanding, or code review.
Reviews code for quality — architecture conformance, anti-patterns, performance issues, maintainability. Read-only analysis that detects circular dependencies, N+1 queries, dead code, naming violations, and layering breaches. Use when the user asks for a code review, wants feedback on code quality, PR review, tech debt analysis, or architecture conformance checks.
Semi-automated design quality review for Flows apps. Runs concrete repo probes (grep, lint, build) to propose a draft 1–5 score for each of the official 10 quality-guidelines questions from docs.cognite.com/cdf/flows/guides/quality-guidelines, then asks the user to confirm or override each score. Still requires the user to walk their tasks end-to-end in the running app (Step 2) since navigation and clickability feel cannot be measured statically. Writes reviews/design-review/feedback-round-<N>/design-review-report.md with an overall average and prioritized fix lists. Use when the user asks to run a Flows design review, run the design quality assessment, or run flows-design-review. Must be run AFTER flows-code-review reaches 0 Must Fix and BEFORE flows-external-app-submit.
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
This skill should be used when verifying that a JIRA ticket meets organizational standards for epic relationships and description quality. It checks epic parent relationships and validates description completeness for coding assistants, developers, and stakeholders.
Execute a complete, deterministic, read-only repository audit and produce a single `improvements.md` action plan with traceable findings (file + lines), severity, category, impact, and high-level fixes. Use when users ask for full code audits, security/performance/architecture reviews, file-by-file analysis, or technical debt mapping without modifying project files.
Proactively analyze user requests at the start of conversations to determine task type, assess prompt quality, and intelligently recommend which skills to activate. Should activate for ALL user requests to ensure optimal workflow. Evaluates clarity, specificity, and completeness to suggest prompt-optimizer when needed. Identifies UI design tasks for ui-analyzer and component requests for react-component-generator. Acts as intelligent skill coordinator.