Loading...
Loading...
Found 30 Skills
Standalone quality review for Elastic integrations. Classifies files by domain, loads domain-specific skills and review checklists, applies cross-domain consistency rules, CEL version verification, API conformance, and severity calibration. Input-agnostic: works on local packages, PR diffs, or branch comparisons. Use when reviewing integration quality independently of any build or fix workflow.
Review implementation quality — catch visual bugs, placeholder text, broken links, and spec drift that functional tests miss. Use this after tests pass to ensure the output looks right, not just works right.
Use when reviewing, fixing, or improving an EXISTING Elastic integration package. Covers quality reviews, targeted fixes (pipelines, field mappings, CEL programs, manifests, changelogs), full improvement passes, and minor adjustments. Use create-integration instead when creating a new package or adding a new data stream from scratch.
Reviews chapter quality with checker agents and generates reports. Use when the user asks for a chapter review or runs /webnovel-review.
Final pass to identify missed items, edge cases, and risks before considering a scope done
Review EXISTING test code for quality, smells, and testability issues. Detects test smells across six dimensions — readability, reliability, diagnostic value, design, AI-generated, and coverage — analyzes testability of application code, and backs the qualitative smells with mutation testing. Use when: "review my tests," "test quality audit," "test smells," "testability analysis," "are these tests any good." Not for: generating new tests — use `ai-test-generation`. Not for: testing AI features in your product — use `ai-system-testing`. Related: unit-testing, shift-left-testing, coverage-analysis, ai-test-generation.