Loading...
Loading...
Found 33 Skills
Displays progress dashboard showing phase completion, blocked tasks, and remaining work estimate. Provides at-a-glance view of implementation status. Run anytime to check progress.
GitHub Spec-Kit integration for constitution-based spec-driven development. 7-phase workflow (constitution, specify, clarify, plan, tasks, analyze, implement). Use when working with spec-kit CLI, .specify/ directories, or creating specifications with constitution-driven development. Triggered by "spec-kit", "speckit", "constitution", "specify", references to .specify/ directory, or spec-kit commands.
Generate phased, dependency-ordered tasks from specs. Identifies parallelization opportunities. task planning, dependency ordering, phased breakdown, parallel tasks Use when: converting specifications to implementation tasks DO NOT use when: writing specs - use spec-writing. Not for execution - use speckit-implement.
Outputs markdown digests and CSV exports for GitHub issues and PRs. Use when creating status reports, weekly updates, stakeholder briefings, generating GitHub comment digests, tracking initiative health. Do not use when release gates/readiness - use release-health-gates. DO NOT use when: project planning - use spec-kit:speckit-orchestrator.
GitHub Spec-Kit integration for constitution-based spec-driven development. 7-phase workflow. Triggers: "spec-kit", "speckit", "constitution", "specify", ".specify/", "规格驱动开发", "需求规格".
Use GitHub Spec Kit's /speckit.implement and /speckit.tasks to systematically build missing features from specifications. Leverages implementation plans in specs/, validates against acceptance criteria, and achieves 100% spec completion. This is Step 6 of 6 in the reverse engineering process.
Interactive conversation to resolve [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers using /speckit.clarify command. Claude asks questions about missing features, UX/UI details, behavior, and priorities. Updates specs in .specify/memory/ with answers to create complete, unambiguous documentation. This is Step 5 of 6 in the reverse engineering process.
Route-aware gap analysis. For Brownfield - uses /speckit.analyze to compare specs against implementation. For Greenfield - validates spec completeness and asks about target tech stack for new implementation. This is Step 4 of 6 in the reverse engineering process.
Scaffolds new projects with README.md, AGENTS.md, and CI/CD (GitLab CI, GitHub Actions). Handles project type (generic / Flask backend / React frontend / Taro miniapp), tech stack, coding standards, quality level, and SDD (OpenSpec, SpecKit, GSD). All init flows (Flask, React, Taro) and conventions (backend-python-cicd, frontend-codegen, flask-backend-codegen, QA/testing, agent-roles/subagents) are built-in; no separate skills. Docs default to Chinese. Use when creating a project, initializing a repo, or setting up CI/CD/SDD.