Loading...
Loading...
Found 604 Skills
3-에이전트(Architect→Builder→Reviewer) 루프로 단일 기능을 설계·구현·검증하는 팀 스킬. "3a로 만들어줘", "3에이전트", "설계-구현-검토", "team-3a" 키워드로 트리거. peach-team보다 가벼운 단일 기능·소규모 수정에 적합.
Use OpenAI Codex CLI through MCP to get AI-powered code analysis, generation, review, and web search directly in your editor
Roblox Luau Development Workflow for implementing, reviewing, and refactoring Roblox game scripts, ModuleScript, ServerScript, LocalScript, RemoteEvent/RemoteFunction, DataStore, and server/client layering. Use when working on Roblox, Luau, Roblox Studio code, Rojo-synced scripts, gameplay systems, UI scripts, replication, remotes, or Roblox services.
Code quality improvement: review, refactoring, debugging. Phases: review feedback, systematic refactoring, root cause debugging, verification. Capabilities: SOLID/DRY compliance, code smell detection, complexity reduction, bug investigation, verification gates. Actions: review, refactor, debug, verify, validate code. Keywords: code review, refactor, debug, SOLID, DRY, code smell, bug fix, root cause, verification, technical debt, extract method, test failure, completion claim. Use when: reviewing code changes, improving code quality, fixing bugs, reducing technical debt, validating before merge/commit.
Practical Python craftsmanship guidance based on One Python Craftsman. Use when writing, refactoring, or reviewing Python code for naming, branching, data structures, functions, exceptions, loops, decorators, imports, file I/O, edge cases, and modern syntax choices. If the skills set includes friendly-python, suggest invoking it for better Python outcomes.
Invokes Gemini CLI as a second opinion. Use for reviewing plans, code, architectural decisions, AND for analyzing large volumes of content that benefit from Gemini's 1M+ token context window.
Philosophy compliance guardian - ensures code aligns with amplihack's ruthless simplicity, brick philosophy, and Zen-like minimalism through systematic review
【WHEN】Activate when the user's command explicitly includes instructions such as "codex collaboration", "codex coordination", "work with codex", etc.; 【WHEN】Activate when the user requests to use the codex MCP tool for collaborative development scenarios such as code analysis, prototype generation, review, etc. 【WHEN NOT】Not applicable for standalone code implementation tasks, pure document writing, or regular development processes that do not involve codex.
Guidelines for creating temporary files in system temp directory. Use when agents need to create reports, logs, or progress files without cluttering the repository.
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Run candid-review in a loop until all issues are resolved, with configurable auto, review-each, or interactive modes and support for ignored issues
Use this agent when you need a final review pass to ensure code changes are as simple and minimal as possible. This agent should be invoked after implementation is complete but before finalizing changes, to identify opportunities for simplification, remove unnecessary complexity, and ensure adherence to YAGNI principles. Examples: <example>Context: The user has just implemented a new feature and wants to ensure it's as simple as possible. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system" assistant: "Great! Let me review the implementation for simplicity and minimalism using the code-simplicity-reviewer agent" <commentary>Since implementation is complete, use the code-simplicity-reviewer agent to identify simplification opportunities.</commentary></example> <example>Context: The user has written complex business logic and wants to simplify it. user: "I think this order processing logic might be overly complex" assistant: "I'll use the code-simplicity-reviewer agent to analyze the complexity...