Loading...
Loading...
Found 5,525 Skills
Manage Harness RBAC roles, role assignments, permissions, and resource groups via MCP v2 tools. List, create, update, and delete custom roles. View role assignments and permissions for users, groups, and service accounts. Use when asked to manage access control, assign roles, check permissions, create custom roles, review RBAC configuration, onboard users, or audit access. Trigger phrases: manage roles, RBAC, role assignment, user permissions, access control, custom role, resource group, who has access, grant access, revoke access.
Complete guide to implementing the Syncfusion NumericTextBox component in ASP.NET Core applications with Tag Helpers, currency/percentage formatting, range validation, and globalization support for building professional numeric input forms.
Comprehensive Rust code review across four lenses — source code (ownership, borrowing, lifetimes, errors, trait design, unsafe, common mistakes), tests (unit, integration, async testing, mocking, property-based), tokio async (task management, sync primitives, channels), and FFI (extern blocks,
Extract Feishu (Lark) Docs, Wiki pages, Wiki collections/hubs, spreadsheets, and Minutes (妙记) transcripts into clean high-fidelity local Markdown. The primary path is the lark-cli API — programmatic extraction with no LLM rewriting of the body — which recursively follows a collection's reference graph (mention-doc / sheet / cross-tenant links) and uses error codes to resolve permission boundaries precisely; a browser-DOM path is the fallback only when lark-cli cannot reach the content. Use this whenever the source is a Feishu/Lark URL and fidelity matters — including 导出飞书文档/合集/妙记转写, 把飞书 wiki/知识库转 markdown, scraping or archiving a Feishu collection, exporting a Feishu Minutes/妙记 transcript, or saving a Feishu page locally — even if the user only says clipping, archiving, converting, or "save this". Also covers the permission-denied path (owner-exported .docx → faithful Markdown with heading/highlight restoration).
Manage cloud infrastructure — monitor deployments, scale resources, manage databases, and handle domain operations across all supported providers.
Use when doing upstream market-research methodology — sizing a market as TAM/SAM/SOM computed BOTH top-down and bottoms-up (never a single unsourced number), planning a survey sample size with finite-population correction and per-segment minimums, or scoring candidate market segments against Kotler's measurable/substantial/accessible/differentiable/actionable criteria. Outputs always show the method and the assumptions. For market-research analysts and product-marketing at the sizing/survey/segmentation moment. Distinct from marketing-skill (campaign analytics, attribution, demand-gen) — this is the evidence-building methodology, not live-campaign optimization.
Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis.
Find working Deepgram integration examples with third-party platforms and frameworks. Use whenever someone wants to integrate Deepgram with Twilio, LiveKit, LangChain, Vercel AI SDK, Discord, Vonage, Pipecat, Expo, FastAPI, Cloudflare Workers, Slack, Telegram, LlamaIndex, Zoom, Next.js, Nuxt, Django, SvelteKit, NestJS, Spring Boot, CrewAI, Riverside, SignalWire, and more. Examples are full runnable integration demos, not minimal feature snippets.
Use when validating that a real-world problem exists before defining JTBD or writing code. Triggers on "is there demand for this?", "how do I validate this idea?", "should we build this?", or before any MVP scope decision. Combines multiple signal sources to produce a Problem Statement with confidence level.
Observe the user's screen via screenpipe, detect repeated research workflows, match them against existing academic-skills, and draft new skills (or composition recipes that chain existing ones) for the patterns not yet covered. Use when the user asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills based on what they actually do. Requires the screenpipe daemon (https://github.com/screenpipe/screenpipe) running locally on port 3030 — the skill has no other data source and will refuse to run if screenpipe is unreachable. All detection runs locally; only redacted cluster summaries reach the LLM.
Produce a comprehensive, evidence-grounded prioritized action plan from any PM input (notes, transcripts, drafts, executive asks, Slack threads, or a raw situation). Outputs one saveable document with an executive summary, input mirror, situation classification (Cynefin), the binding constraint (Theory of Constraints), prioritized questions and open decisions, a ranked action plan with the critical effort plus follow-ons, risks and pre-mortem, copy/paste prompts for downstream pm-skills, and an evidence map. Builds a source ledger and cites exact input quotes; refuses High-confidence plans for Complex or Chaotic situations. Use when you want the critical next effort and how to execute it.
Use when creating or revising model PR optimization history documents for SGLang, vLLM, or another serving framework that cite GitHub PRs. Requires manual, per-PR source-diff review and documentation of motivation, key implementation approach, most important code excerpts, reviewed files, and validation implications instead of generated or one-line summaries.