Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,528 Skills
Automated accessibility testing with axe-core, Playwright, and jest-axe for WCAG compliance. Use when adding or validating a11y tests, running WCAG checks, or auditing UI accessibility.
Fresh-subagent-per-task execution with two-stage review (ADR compliance + code quality). Use when an implementation plan exists with mostly independent tasks and you want quality gates between each. Use for "execute plan", "subagent", "dispatch tasks", or multi-task implementation runs. Do NOT use for single simple tasks, tightly coupled work needing shared context, or when the user wants manual review after each task.
Execute a micro-level Flutter code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, architecture, and code implementation. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check Flutter code quality, validate best practices, or review code standards compliance. Triggers on: 'flutter best practices', 'code quality', 'code review', 'flutter standards', 'architecture compliance', 'testing quality'.
Apply when handling credit card data, implementing secureProxyUrl flows, or working with payment security and proxy code. Covers PCI DSS compliance, Secure Proxy card tokenization, sensitive data handling rules, X-PROVIDER-Forward-To header usage, and custom token creation. Use for any payment connector that processes credit, debit, or co-branded card payments to prevent data breaches and PCI violations.
Audit changed Vue/RDS UI for WCAG 2.1 Level A/AA compliance and return actionable, severity-ranked findings with file references. Use when reviewing frontend changes, preparing PRs, or validating release readiness.
Guide fee disclosure compliance across advisory, brokerage, fund, and retirement plan contexts. Use when the user asks about Form ADV Item 5 fee schedules, prospectus fee table format, Reg BI cost disclosure obligations, 12b-1 fee transparency, revenue sharing arrangements, wrap fee program costs, or ERISA 408(b)(2) service provider fee disclosure. Also trigger when users mention 'hidden fees', 'total cost to the client', 'are we disclosing all layers of fees', 'expense ratio comparison', 'fee billing in advance vs arrears', 'share class selection', 'indirect compensation', or ask whether fee disclosures are complete and compliant.
Prepare advisors for client review meetings by assembling context packages, performance summaries, drift analysis, talking points, and meeting agendas. Use when the user asks about preparing for a client review, building a pre-meeting checklist, generating talking points for an upcoming meeting, identifying allocation drift before a review, automating review prep workflows, or assembling a meeting package with exhibits. Also trigger when users mention 'client meeting prep', 'review preparation', 'what should I discuss with my client', 'proactive recommendations', 'life event triggered review', 'meeting agenda', or 'compliance pre-check before review'.
Use when reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, implementing authentication or authorization, handling user input, managing secrets, or auditing dependencies for known CVEs. Triggers: auth implementation, input handling, secrets management, dependency audit, pre-deployment security check, OWASP compliance review.
Use when designing inclusive animations, addressing vestibular disorders and motion sensitivity, or ensuring animation accessibility compliance.
Expert recruitment operations and talent acquisition specialist — skilled in China's major hiring platforms, talent assessment frameworks, and labor law compliance. Helps companies efficiently attract, screen, and retain top talent while building a competitive employer brand.
Work with c15t consent management docs, APIs, and integrations for Next.js, React, and JavaScript. Use when the user asks about c15t setup, components, hooks, styling, cookie/consent UX, GDPR/CCPA/IAB TCF compliance, script or iframe blocking, GTM/GA4/PostHog/Meta integrations etc, or self-hosting c15t/backend.
Scores completed OKR sets at cycle close with KR-level scoring per the canonical OKR type enum (committed | aspirational | learning | operational_health | compliance_or_safety), committed-vs-aspirational interpretation, evidence quality assessment, learning synthesis, and next-cycle recommendations. Refuses to retroactively change targets or shrink committed scope, average away guardrail KRs, treat 0.7 as success for committed or compliance_or_safety KRs, equate effort with impact, or use scores for individual performance. Hands off to iterate-lessons-log, iterate-retrospective, define-hypothesis, measure-dashboard-requirements, measure-instrumentation-spec, and foundation-okr-writer.