Loading...
Loading...
Found 818 Skills
Inspect or run the manual maintenance workflow. Uses explicitly configured repository checks, applies safe auto-fixes, and archives successful maintenance changes.
Use the harem hierarchical code review system to output structured review conclusions based on the division of labor among the Empress, Four Consorts, and Nine Imperial Concubines
Use anime-style multi-role continuous conversational code review to output review opinions with natural technical anchors through strong character interaction
Build a pre-implementation harness for ambiguous or risky coding tasks by grounding the request in the repository, producing a structured impact map, surfacing ambiguities and risks, defining scope boundaries, and creating a validation-ready implementation contract before any code changes are made. Use when a task is broad, underspecified, cross-cutting, or likely to drift without an explicit planning checkpoint.
Iterative code refinement through plan → code → evaluate → refine cycles. Runs lint checks (ruff), tests (pytest), and structured self-evaluation each cycle, then diagnoses failures and refines. Decomposes complex tasks into sequential phases, iterates up to 3 times per phase (10 total). Use when: the main agent delegates a code task with 'MODE: MORE_EFFORT', the user selects 'More Effort' code generation mode, or the task explicitly requests iterative refinement for higher code quality. Do NOT use for single-pass code generation (Lite mode), experiment pipeline orchestration (use experiment-pipeline), or diagnosing a specific experiment failure (use experiment-craft).
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
Analyze code for patterns, complexity, dependencies, and quality. Use when: code review, refactoring, understanding codebases.
Implements SDD plan tasks following specs and design, marking progress in tasks.md as it goes. Trigger: /sdd-apply <change-name>, implement change, apply SDD tasks, write code for change.
Analyzes staged and unstaged files from the full working tree, groups them into functional clusters (test, docs, chore, directory prefix), generates a conventional commit message per group, detects common issues (secrets, debug statements, large files), and executes one commit per group sequentially after presenting a multi-commit plan for confirmation. Falls through to a single-commit flow when all detected files resolve to one group. Trigger: When the user says "commit", "smart commit", or /commit.
Parallel adversarial review protocol that launches two independent blind judge sub-agents simultaneously to review the same target, synthesizes their findings, applies fixes, and re-judges until both pass or escalates after 2 iterations. Trigger: When user says "judgment day", "judgment-day", "review adversarial", "dual review", "doble review", "juzgar", "que lo juzguen".
Aggressively clean up a codebase by removing AI slop, dead code, weak types, defensive over-engineering, duplication, and legacy cruft. Orchestrates 8 specialized subagents in parallel to deduplicate code, consolidate types, kill unused code, untangle circular dependencies, strengthen weak types, remove unnecessary try/catch, delete deprecated/legacy paths, and strip unhelpful comments. Use when the user asks to 'clean up the codebase', 'remove slop', 'improve code quality', 'remove dead code', 'kill AI slop', 'tighten types', 'remove legacy code', 'deduplicate code', 'DRY this up', 'untangle dependencies', or wants a thorough code quality pass. Also use when the user mentions code smells, technical debt cleanup, or refactoring for clarity — even if they don't use the word 'slop'.
Review a pull request — check diff, run tests, report findings