Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,269 Skills
Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.
Code review closeout for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and DeepSeek TUI: local dirty changes, branch vs main, parallel tests.
Run accessibility and visual design review on components. Use when reviewing UI code for WCAG compliance and design issues.
Use when the user asks for a code review by a fleet of specialized reviewer agents, wants multiple independent reviewer perspectives, or asks to run reviewers in single-pass or iterative fix-until-clean mode. Launches focused subagents for correctness, security, architecture, conventions, simplicity, UX, reliability, telemetry, testing, compatibility, and documentation review.
Security vulnerability expert covering OWASP Top 10 and common security issues. Use when conducting security audits or reviewing code for vulnerabilities.
Expert application security engineer specializing in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment, secure code review, and security architecture design for modern web and cloud-native applications.
PASS, FLAG, and BLOCK review discipline for workflow review, QA verification, release checks, and issue closeout.
Reviews staged git changes for code quality, maintainability, readability, and potential regressions. Verifies changes make sense in context, improve maintainability, enhance readability, and don't introduce side effects. Use when reviewing staged changes, examining git diffs, or when the user asks to review modifications before committing.
Verify review or audit findings and fix confirmed issues
Runs the full validator workflow after coding tasks for requests such as "run the validator", "run final verification", "validate before commit", or "run validation". Executes checks and reviews before commit, push, or PR creation.
Evaluate verified findings from merge-ready, Greptile, pull-request, CI, security, billing, and other code reviews, then promote durable review gaps into the version-controlled .greptile configuration. Use when a review uncovers a recurring or high-risk repository invariant that Greptile does not capture, when Greptile repeatedly produces a false positive, or when asked to audit or update OpenSEO's Greptile rules and context.
Explore any codebase from scratch and generate six quality artifacts: a quality constitution (QUALITY.md), spec-traced functional tests, a code review protocol, an integration testing protocol, a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and an AI bootstrap file (AGENTS.md). Works with any language (Python, Java, Scala, TypeScript, Go, Rust, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user asks to set up a quality playbook, generate functional tests from specifications, create a quality constitution, build testing protocols, audit code against specs, or establish a repeatable quality system for a project. Also trigger when the user mentions 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', 'coverage theater', or wants to go beyond basic test generation to build a full quality system grounded in their actual codebase.