Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,086 Skills
Company HR specialist providing expert guidance on job descriptions, interview processes, candidate evaluation, onboarding, performance management, and HR policies. Use when working on human resources tasks and people operations.
AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.
Production-ready financial analyst skill with ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance analysis, and rolling forecast construction. 4 Python tools (all stdlib-only). Works with Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenClaw.
Find and evaluate Claude skills for specific use cases using semantic search, Anthropic best practices assessment, and fitness scoring. Use when the user asks to find skills for a particular task (e.g., "find me a skill for pitch decks"), not for generic "show all skills" requests.
Content quality and E-E-A-T assessment for AI citability — evaluate experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness, and content structure
Use after the final approved execution scope is complete, or when the user asks whether a feature is done, ready to ship, safe to merge, or needs a quality check. Runs the post-execution quality gate: specialist review, artifact verification, and human UAT against locked decisions and the final exit state. Use for prompts like "review this feature", "is this done?", "can we ship this?", "double-check the implementation", or "run UAT".
· Batch-improve skill collections with evaluation loops, lint checks, behavioral tests, peer review. Triggers: 'skill refiner', 'improve skills', 'quality sweep', 'batch improve', 'skill loop'. Not for one skill.
Run cross-framework agent comparisons using evaluatorq from orqkit — compares any combination of agents (orq.ai, LangGraph, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents SDK, Vercel AI SDK) head-to-head on the same dataset with LLM-as-a-judge scoring. Use when comparing agents, benchmarking, or wanting side-by-side evaluation. Do NOT use when comparing only orq.ai configurations with no external agents (use run-experiment instead).
Research and discovery workflow for document deliverables — competitive analyses, architecture comparisons, ADR scaffolding, literature reviews, vendor evaluations. No TDD requirement. Phases: gathering → synthesizing → completed. Triggers: 'discover', 'research', 'explore topic', or /discover.
Real-time quotes, static reference, and valuation indices for stocks listed in HK / US / A-share / Singapore via Longbridge Securities. Returns last price, change, volume, turnover, market cap, industry, PE/PB, turnover-rate, and other indicators. Triggers: "现在多少钱", "股价", "涨跌幅", "成交量", "市值", "市盈率", "PE", "PB", "换手率", "行业", "現在多少", "股價", "成交量", "市值", "市盈率", "stock price", "current price", "quote", "market cap", "PE ratio", "valuation", "NVDA price", "AAPL quote", "茅台市值", "腾讯股价", "700.HK", "600519.SH".
Sector-rotation snapshot across A-share, HK, and US markets — point-in-time multi-factor scoring of momentum, capital flow, and valuation to rank sectors by current cycle strength. For ongoing 6–12 month cycle positioning and allocation recommendations use longbridge-sector-monitor. Triggers: "行业轮动", "板块轮动", "行业动量排名", "强势板块", "弱势板块", "行业资金流", "板块涨幅榜", "行業輪動", "板塊輪動", "行業動量排名", "強勢板塊", "弱勢板塊", "行業資金流", "板塊漲幅榜", "sector rotation", "sector momentum ranking", "leading sector", "lagging sector", "sector capital flow", "sector strength ranking".
Design failing tests for complex features using Independent Evaluation — dispatches a context-free agent that sees only the requirement spec and code paths (not the implementation approach), then returns executable failing tests. Use when starting TDD for a non-trivial feature, when the requirement is ambiguous enough that biased tests are a risk, or when the user asks for independent test design.