Loading...
Loading...
Found 459 Skills
Pull request authoring standards — structured descriptions, linking issues, providing test evidence, and writing good summaries. Reference when creating or describing pull requests.
Reviews error handling strategy and exception design. Use when the user asks to review error handling, when a module throws too many exceptions, or when callers must handle errors they shouldn't need to know about. Applies the "define errors out of existence" principle with a decision tree for exception strategies.
Diagnoses what makes code complex and why, using the three-symptom two-root-cause framework. Use when code feels harder to work with than it should but the specific problem is unclear. This skill identifies WHETHER complexity exists and WHERE it comes from. Not for scanning a checklist of known design smells (use red-flags) or evaluating a specific module's depth (use deep-modules).
Systematic workflow for CodeRabbit reviews - local CLI, PR threads, and commit attribution
Test coverage-focused code review. Apply when reviewing code for missing unit tests, integration tests, edge cases, error handling paths, test quality, and test maintainability.
When writing or reviewing code to eliminate duplicated knowledge and business logic. Use when the user says "this is duplicated," "we have this in two places," "single source of truth," "DRY this up," or "shotgun surgery." For premature abstraction concerns, see yagni.
This skill should be used when creating conventional commits for current changes and then submitting the current branch as a pull request for code review. It combines the git:commit and git:submit-pr skills into a single workflow.
When writing or reviewing code to prevent over-engineering and speculative features. Use when the user says "is this over-engineered," "do we need this," "should I add," "future-proof," or "just in case." For simplicity concerns, see kiss. For abstraction design, see solid.
Details Paraglide.js i18n implementations.
Adversarial code review using the opposite model. Spawns 1–3 reviewers on the opposing model (Claude spawns Codex, Codex spawns Claude) to challenge work from distinct critical lenses. Triggers: "adversarial review".
General code quality and engineering discipline. Use on any code task to enforce minimal, clean, production-grade changes. Follow these rules when writing, editing, or reviewing code. Activates on: code, implement, fix, build, refactor, feature, bug, change, modify, add, create, develop, write, edit, improve, optimize, update, remove, delete, rename, move, extract, inline, migrate, convert, replace, rewrite.
Use when every architecture and implementation decision must be traceable with explicit rationale; pair with architect-stack-selector and addon-human-pr-review-gate.