Loading...
Loading...
Found 803 Skills
Core reference for DefiLlama MCP tools. Maps DeFi questions to the correct tool call with proper parameters. Covers entity conventions, metric interpretation, stock vs flow distinctions, percentage formatting, and error recovery. Use whenever querying DeFi data — protocol TVL, token prices, chain metrics, fees, revenue, yields, stablecoins, bridges, ETFs, hacks, raises, treasuries, or institutional holdings.
Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics. Automated validation with regex patterns, thresholds, and reporting.
Build and deploy a Coralogix dashboard for a given service from its logs, spans, metrics, and service specs. Discovers telemetry via cx CLI commands, emits importable Coralogix JSON, verifies every PromQL and DataPrime query live through the `cx` CLI, and creates or updates dashboards via `cx dashboards create` and `cx dashboards replace`. Use whenever the user asks to create, build, generate, deploy, update, replace, or modify a Coralogix dashboard, monitoring dashboard, or observability dashboard for a service, app, or pipeline.
Build pre-earnings analysis with estimate models, scenario frameworks, and key metrics to watch. Use before a company reports quarterly earnings to prepare positioning notes, set up bull/bear scenarios, and identify what will move the stock. Triggers on "earnings preview", "what to watch for [company] earnings", "pre-earnings", "earnings setup", or "preview Q[X] for [company]".
Use when planning A/B tests in LaunchDarkly, Optimizely, or similar platforms. Sizes the experiment (sample size, MDE, runtime), drafts hypothesis + success metrics + guardrails, and produces a launch checklist + rollback plan.
Detect AI-generated code patterns ("slop") in PHP/Laravel and TypeScript/React source — comment narration, generic naming, premature interfaces, defensive overdose, mock-everything tests, and the absence of human "scars". Use when reviewing AI-assisted PRs, auditing code for taste/quality (not metrics — that's technical-debt), or hardening a code-review checklist. Triggers on "review for AI slop", "find AI patterns", "check code feels human", "audit code-quality taste".
AI-powered portfolio risk management and optimization. Use when sizing positions, managing portfolio allocation, calculating risk metrics (VaR, Sharpe), rebalancing, or implementing defensive strategies. Covers: position sizing, correlation analysis, drawdown management, dynamic rebalancing, kill switches.
DORA (DevOps Research and Assessment) Core Model for measuring and improving software delivery performance. Use this skill to assess team performance tier, identify capability gaps, and connect delivery metrics to product release strategy.
Owns the smoke test contract for an ML experiment: a small, diagnostic-by-construction pytest that fits the experiment's learner on a portion of the real `data/` source and predicts on a *disjoint* portion that deliberately carries **no pre-history buffer**. The assertion is structural — the number of predictions must equal the number of rows in the predict grid. A pipeline that loads-then-features-then-splits will silently drop the cold-start rows of the predict slice and the test will fail with a row-count mismatch; a pipeline that marks X early and references upstream history nodes from feature steps will pass trivially. The smoke test is the executable proof of the X-marker placement rule from `build-ml-pipeline`. TRIGGER when: `test-ml-pipeline` has dispatched here to write the smoke test for an approved experiment; `pytest tests/smoke/` is failing on row count; the user asks "why is the smoke test failing?"; a pipeline edit in `build-ml-pipeline` needs an executable proof; an experiment script changes the pipeline shape and the matching smoke test needs revisiting. SKIP when: the design note does not exist or is not yet approved (route to `iterate-ml-experiment`); the user is asking about a regression test or schema invariant (route to `regression-test-ml-pipeline` / `distribution-test-ml-pipeline` once those exist); the question is the *interpretation* of CV metrics, not predict-time correctness (route to `evaluate-ml-pipeline`). HOW TO USE: read the matching experiment's `journal/NN_*.md` and `experiments/NN_*.py` first to understand the pipeline's source binding (what env-dict keys does `build_learner` expect?). Then construct two env-dicts from the **real `data/` source** — a train env and a predict env — such that the predict env carries *only the rows we want predictions for* and *no pre-history buffer*. The hard assertion is that the prediction count matches the predict-env row count exactly. The soft assertion is that the smoke set's MAE is within `3 × CV_mean` (or the task-appropriate analogue). **Do not write the design note or run CV — that's other skills' job.**
Analyze production Agentforce agent behavior using session traces and Data Cloud. TRIGGER when: user queries STDM session data or Data Cloud trace records; investigates production agent failures, regressions, or performance issues; asks about session traces, conversation logs, or agent metrics; wants to reproduce a reported production issue in preview; runs findSessions or trace analysis queries. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, or debugs .agent files during development (use agentforce-generate); writes or runs test specs (use agentforce-test); uses sf agent preview for local development iteration; deploys or publishes agents.
Designs effective KPI dashboards with proper metric selection, visual hierarchy, and data visualization best practices. Use when building executive dashboards, creating analytics views, or presenting business metrics.
MLflow experiment tracking via Python API. TRIGGERS - MLflow metrics, log backtest, experiment tracking, search runs.