Loading...
Loading...
Found 5,420 Skills
Source-first, self-loop resistant guardrails for Capy GitHub dialogue responders before any write-capable PR, issue, or review action.
Use when looking for a CLI, API wrapper, scraper, data-source tool, automation tool, or focused agent skill for a task; searches the Printing Press Library and installs matching tools.
Proposal-first scientific writing pipeline. Three modes (compose/revise/hybrid) with a four-layer QA pipeline. It enforces the principles of evidence-before-prose, argument-before-sections, and contracts-before-paragraphs.
Verify journals, prepare submission documents, check disclosures, and organize reviewer responses and revision evidence. Use when the user asks for "preparing for submission", "journal selection", "responding to reviewer comments", or requests the rw-journal-submission workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Design and execute reproducible systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other evidence synthesis processes. Use when the user asks for "conduct a systematic review", "how to conduct a scoping review", "design a screening process", or requests the rw-review-methods workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Research questions external to the codebase across library docs (Context7), the web (Tavily), local code through semantic source search, GitHub examples (gh), and the repo wiki (hallouminate), then synthesize with explicit confidence. Use whenever the user asks to research, look up, compare, or investigate something — phrases like "research X", "look up the API for Y", "compare libraries", "what does the doc say about Z", "find examples of how to do W", "is this library maintained", or "before I implement, what's the right approach". Use even when the user only mentions a library name without saying "research". Do NOT use for a single obvious file lookup or when the user already has enough evidence.
Facilitates the final step of a proven ideal-customer (ICP) method: synthesizing the working files — strengths and weaknesses, honed keystones, deal-breakers, and inciting events — into CAROL.md, the crisp definition of the ideal customer. The definition leads the file, behavioral and attitudinal, never demographic unless genuinely determinative; every marker must clear the bar that Marketing can target it, Sales can qualify against it, and Product can build features to thrill it. Brief reference sections on keystones, deal-breakers, and inciting events follow, because positioning, marketing, and feature work consume them. When keystone segments diverge, the skill forces the choice of a primary rather than averaging. Load when the user has the working files and says 'define our Carol,' 'write our ideal customer profile,' or 'who is our ICP.' Do NOT load to produce the upstream files (observations through inciting events), or to write the positioning, ads, or feature plans that start FROM this definition.
Define, track, and act on QA metrics: test coverage percentage, flakiness rate, defect escape rate, MTTR, test execution time trends, automation ROI, quality gates, and SLAs for test suites. Includes metric formulas, realistic targets by company stage, and the action to take when each metric goes red. Use when: "QA metrics," "test metrics," "quality KPIs," "test health," "flakiness rate," "defect escape rate." Not for: building the dashboard UI (Allure/Grafana) — use qa-dashboard; measuring coverage gaps and mutation score — use coverage-analysis. Related: qa-dashboard, coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, release-readiness, quality-postmortem.
Define KPIs, metrics, and tracking systems to measure brand health, awareness, perception, and equity over time. Use when the user says "brand measurement", "brand metrics", "how do we measure the brand", "brand KPIs", "brand health tracking", "brand awareness metrics", "brand equity measurement", "is our brand working", "brand ROI", "brand performance", "brand tracking", "brand health score", "prove brand value", "brand dashboard", or needs to show stakeholders whether brand investment is delivering results.
Assess the health and consistency of an existing brand — identity, messaging, voice, positioning, and market perception. Use when the user says "brand audit", "brand review", "assess our brand", "is our brand consistent", "brand health check", "brand analysis", "something's off with our brand", "our brand feels outdated", "brand diagnosis", "review our brand", "brand gap analysis", or wants to understand where their brand is strong and where it needs work before investing in brand development.
Use when the user asks to "plan my site structure", "design the page hierarchy / navigation / URL taxonomy", "fix internal linking", or "find orphan pages"; runs two modes — architecture (hierarchy, nav, URL patterns, hub/spoke clusters, Mermaid site maps) and linking (link graph, authority flow, anchor text, orphan disposition, source/target/anchor plan) — and outputs a structure score /100 plus a handoff summary. Not for external backlinks — use offsite-signal-analyzer; not for XML sitemap or indexation issues — use technical-seo-checker. 网站架构/信息架构/站点地图/内链优化
Use this when converting an AI-generated static HTML page (Stardust, Mobirise, Relume, Lovable, v0, Figma-derived, etc.) into an Edge Delivery Services page while preserving the original design and making content authorable in Document Authoring — triggers include "convert this page to EDS", "static-to-EDS overlay", "convert to EDS blocks", "next experimentation", "next run", "start run", or providing a source URL to make editable in DA. Covers two modes — page-level (overlay template with slot markers) and block-level (each section becomes an independent EDS block). For canonical EDS block-rewrite migrations use page-import instead.