Loading...
Loading...
Found 98 Skills
Review one change set in one mode (`pr` or `local`) for correctness, security, tests, and scope, and return a clear go/no-go decision. Triggers: review pr, review local, readiness check, pre-merge review.
Manage repositories, check pipelines, review PRs, and collaborate on Bitbucket
Go-specific code review with 6-phase methodology: Context, Automated Checks, Quality Analysis, Specific Analysis, Line-by-Line, Documentation. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or auditing Go codebases for quality and best practices. Use for "review Go", "Go PR", "check Go code", "Go quality", "review .go". Do NOT use for writing new Go code, debugging Go bugs, or refactoring -- use golang-general-engineer, systematic-debugging, or systematic-refactoring for those tasks.
Adversarial code review with anti-trust verification. Verifies every implementer claim against the actual diff. Use when reviewing PRs, branches, or recent commits.
Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis
Identifies silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior in code. Zero tolerance for errors that occur without proper logging and user feedback. Triggers: When reviewing error handling, checking for silent failures, analyzing catch blocks. Examples: - "Review the error handling" -> audits all error handling in recent changes - "Check for silent failures" -> hunts for swallowed errors and empty catch blocks - "Analyze catch blocks in this PR" -> reviews every try-catch for adequacy - "Are there any hidden failures?" -> finds errors that get silently ignored
Use when the user asks to create a CodeTour .tour file — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: create a tour, onboarding tour, architecture tour, PR review tour, explain how X works, vibe check, RCA tour, contributor guide, or any structured code walkthrough request.
Finds open GitHub PRs with security and priority-high labels, links each to its issue, detects duplicates (multiple PRs fixing the same issue), and presents a table of review candidates. Use when looking for the next PR to review. Trigger keywords - find pr, find review, next pr, pr to review, duplicate pr, security pr.
Routes human attention to decisions that matter in agent-generated code. Active during planning, implementing, fixing. Defines when and how to place DECISION markers in code comments. Also applies when reviewing a diff/PR on request.
Audit codebases with full recognition and PR review for uncommitted changes. Detects SEO issues, technical problems, security vulnerabilities, accessibility issues, performance bottlenecks, and more. Supports Normal, Strict, and Expert modes with Complete Audit or PR Review options.
Standardized output format for code reviews with severity labels, file:line references, and fix code snippets. Use when generating review reports that need consistent, actionable feedback structure.
Guides Android code reviews with type-specific checklists and MVVM/Compose pattern validation. Use when reviewing Android PRs, pull requests, diffs, or local changes involving Kotlin, ViewModel, Composable, Repository, or Gradle files. Triggered by "review PR", "review changes", "check this code", "Android review", or code review requests mentioning bitwarden/android. Loads specialized checklists for feature additions, bug fixes, UI refinements, refactoring, dependency updates, and infrastructure changes.