Loading...
Loading...
Found 75 Skills
Reviews URLSession networking code for iOS/macOS. Covers async/await patterns, request building, error handling, caching, and background sessions.
Guide for building, auditing, and refactoring Swift code using modern concurrency patterns (Swift 6+). This skill should be used when working with async/await, Tasks, actors, MainActor, Sendable types, isolation domains, or when migrating legacy callback/Combine code to structured concurrency. Covers Approachable Concurrency settings, isolated parameters, and common pitfalls.
Review code through hostile perspectives to find bugs, security issues, and unintended consequences the author missed. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing codebases, or before critical deployments.
Rust unsafe code skill for systems programming. Use when writing or reviewing unsafe Rust, understanding what operations require unsafe, implementing safe abstractions over unsafe code, auditing unsafe blocks, or understanding raw pointers, transmute, and extern. Activates on queries about unsafe Rust, raw pointers, transmute, unsafe blocks, writing safe wrappers, UnsafeCell, unsafe trait impl, or auditing unsafe code.
Coverage-guided fuzzing workflow for C/C++, Rust, and Go targets. Runs audit-context-building to find suspicious code, writes a targeted harness, builds with sanitizers, runs the fuzzer, and reports crashes.
Code review and audit system with specialized sub-skills covering SOLID principles, security, performance, architecture, error handling, testing, code smells, design patterns, and framework best practices. Generates severity-scored findings with copy-pasteable fix prompts. Strictly read-only — never modifies user code. Use when user says "review", "audit", "code review", "check my code", "security scan", "code smells", "SOLID check".
Use when the user asks to investigate, audit, trace, or explain how a feature, issue, module, workflow, API, config, or behavior works across one or more codebase projects.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "review PR", "code review", "audit code", "check for bugs", "security review", "review my changes", "find issues in this code", "review the diff", or asks for pull request review or code audit.
Verification boundary CLI that delegates tasks to autonomous agents. Use when the user wants to run forge, execute specs, run specs in parallel, audit code against specs, review changes, watch live logs, check run status, resume a session, or delegate complex multi-step work to an autonomous agent. Triggers include "forge run", "run this spec", "run specs in parallel", "audit the codebase", "review changes", "forge watch", "forge status", "rerun failed", "delegate this to forge".
Use when wanting independent review from external models before merging, committing, or finalizing architecture or plan decisions, or when the user asks for a second opinion, codex review, or gemini review
Analytical thinking patterns for comprehensive evaluation, code audits, security analysis, and performance reviews. Provides structured templates for thorough investigation with extended thinking support.
Challenges AI-generated plans, code, designs, and decisions before you commit. Pairs with any other skill as a review layer. Uses pre-mortem analysis, inversion thinking, and Socratic questioning to find what AI missed — blind spots, hidden assumptions, failure modes, and optimistic shortcuts. The skill that asks "are you sure about that?" so you don't have to. Triggers on: "challenge this", "devils advocate", "stress test this plan", "what could go wrong", "poke holes in this", "review this critically", "second opinion on this design", "what am I missing". Use this skill when you need critical review of any AI-generated output, architecture decision, implementation plan, or code before committing to it.