Loading...
Loading...
Found 399 Skills
Use this skill to automate visual testing and UI interaction verification using browser automation after deploying features.
Validates SKILL.md files against Claude Code skill best practices. Checks conciseness, description quality, progressive disclosure, workflow structure, and common anti-patterns. Use when reviewing or auditing skills before shipping.
Expert in quality assurance and testing. Responsible for bug detection, edge case validation, test planning, and automated test creation to ensure software reliability.
Answers questions about a code repository using source file analysis. Use when the user asks a question about how something works, wants to understand a component, or needs help navigating the codebase.
Comprehensive quality assurance and testing workflow that orchestrates test strategy design, automated testing implementation, performance testing, and quality metrics. Handles everything from unit testing and integration testing to end-to-end testing, performance testing, and quality assurance automation.
Create QA checklists for verifying design implementation accuracy.
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.
Browser QA — Automated Visual Testing & Interaction
Multi-agent QA review team for code changes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "review my code", "run QA", "qa-team", "review this branch", "code review", "check my changes", or wants a comprehensive multi-perspective code review of the current branch's changes. Spawns parallel specialist agents (security, database, reliability, compatibility, data integrity, performance, frontend, copy) that independently review the diff and produce a converged report. Also includes two generalist reviewers for convergence validation.
Drive a real browser to QA a feature end-to-end as a user would. Loads the right mix of Playwright MCP, Claude-in-Chrome, and computer-use, plus the failure modes to avoid. Use whenever you need to verify a UI feature works in a browser, capture PR screenshots, repro a customer bug visually, or do end-of-task dogfooding before declaring something "done". This is the QA stage of orchestrate mode.
Conversational bug discovery → issue draft. Light listening, background exploration, scope assessment. Asks before gh issue create — never auto-files. Use when conducting a QA session, triaging user-reported issues, or filing bugs.
Record human-in-the-loop quality judgments for generated images, voice takes, and videos in short-form production. Use this when a person has reviewed an asset and you need structured verdicts, reasons, issue categories, and rerun guidance without turning subjective approval into untracked chat history.