Loading...
Loading...
Found 149 Skills
Coordinate PR mining to extract tribal knowledge and coding standards from GitHub PR history. Use when mining review comments, extracting coding rules, tracking mining jobs, or analyzing reviewer patterns across repositories. Use for "mine PRs", "extract standards", "coding rules from reviews", or "reviewer patterns". Do NOT use for code review, linting, static analysis, or writing new coding standards from scratch without PR data.
Systematic 4-phase codebase exploration: Detect, Explore, Map, Summarize. Use when starting work on an unfamiliar codebase, onboarding to a new project, reviewing a repository for the first time, or building context before debugging or code review. Use for "explore codebase", "what does this project do", "understand architecture", or "onboard me". Do NOT use for modifying files, running applications, performance optimization, or deep domain analysis.
Create session handoff artifacts (HANDOFF.json + .continue-here.md) that capture completed work, remaining tasks, decisions, uncommitted files, and reasoning context so the next session can resume without reconstruction overhead. Use for "pause", "save progress", "handoff", "stopping for now", "end session", "pick this up later". Do NOT use for task planning (use task_plan.md), session summaries (use /retro), or committing work (use /commit or git directly).
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with strict phase gates. Write failing test first, implement minimum code to pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when implementing new features, fixing bugs with test-first approach, improving test coverage, or when user mentions TDD. Use for "TDD", "test first", "red green refactor", "write tests", or "implement with tests". Do NOT use for debugging existing failures (use systematic-debugging) or for refactoring without new tests (use systematic-refactoring).
Prompt engineering patterns including structured prompts, chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, and system prompt design
Evaluate agents and skills for quality, completeness, and standards compliance using a 6-step rubric: Identify, Structural, Content, Code, Integration, Report. Use when auditing agents/skills, checking quality after creation or update, or reviewing collection health. Triggers: "evaluate", "audit", "check quality", "review agent", "score skill". Do NOT use for creating or modifying agents/skills — only for read-only assessment and scoring.
Tracked lightweight execution with composable rigor flags for tasks between a typo fix and a full feature. Plan + execute with optional --discuss, --research, and --full flags to add rigor incrementally. Use for "quick task", "small change", "ad hoc task", "add a flag", "extract function", "small refactor", "fix bug in X". Do NOT use for multi-component features, architectural changes, or anything needing wave-based parallel execution — those are Simple+ tier.
Generate blog post topic ideas through problem mining, gap analysis, and technology expansion. Use when user needs content ideas, wants to brainstorm articles, asks "what should I write about", or needs to fill content gaps. Use for "brainstorm", "topic ideas", "what to write", "content gaps", or "blog ideas". Do NOT use for writing posts, creating outlines, or SEO optimization without a specific ideation need.
Go-specific code review with 6-phase methodology: Context, Automated Checks, Quality Analysis, Specific Analysis, Line-by-Line, Documentation. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or auditing Go codebases for quality and best practices. Use for "review Go", "Go PR", "check Go code", "Go quality", "review .go". Do NOT use for writing new Go code, debugging Go bugs, or refactoring -- use golang-general-engineer, systematic-debugging, or systematic-refactoring for those tasks.
Phase-gated git commit workflow with validation, staging, and CLAUDE.md compliance enforcement. Use when creating commits, staging changes, or when PR workflows need standardized commits. Triggers: "commit changes", "save work", "create commit", or internal skill invocation from PR workflows. Do NOT use for merge commits, rebases, amends, cherry-picks, or emergency rollbacks requiring raw git speed.
Question-only debugging mode that guides users to find root causes themselves through structured questioning. Never gives answers directly. Escalates to systematic-debugging after 12 questions if no progress. Use when: "rubber duck", "help me think through this bug", "debug with me", "walk me through debugging", "socratic debug", "think through this issue"
Collaborative design phase for feature lifecycle: explore requirements, discuss trade-offs, produce design document. Use when starting a new feature that needs design before implementation. Use for "design feature", "let's think through", "explore approaches", or "/feature-design". Do NOT use for simple bug fixes or tasks that don't need design discussion.