Loading...
Loading...
Found 90 Skills
Review and refactor code in your project according to defined instructions
Run a formal, multi-dimensional code review of a pull request. Reads the PR diff, classifies change types, dispatches parallel reviewers by dimension (correctness, consistency, docs-sync, plus conditional security/edge-cases/UX/performance/structure/maintainability), and synthesizes findings into an actionable punch list. Use when the user asks to review a PR, run /deep-review, mark a PR as ready for review, or requests a formal/thorough code review.
Refactor given method `${input:methodName}` to reduce its cognitive complexity to `${input:complexityThreshold}` or below, by extracting helper methods.
Restructures existing code to improve readability, maintainability, and performance without changing external behavior. USE WHEN: Restructuring code without changing behavior, extracting methods/classes, removing duplication, applying design patterns, improving code organization, reducing technical debt. DO NOT USE: For bug fixes (use /debugging), for adding tests (use /testing), for new features (implement directly). TRIGGERS: refactor, restructure, rewrite, clean up, simplify, extract, inline, rename, move, split, merge, decompose, modularize, decouple, technical debt, code smell, DRY, SOLID, improve code, modernize, reorganize.
Use when designing modules, APIs, and system architecture requiring independent, non-overlapping components where changes in one don't affect others.
Language-agnostic coding principles for maintainability, readability, and quality. Use when implementing features, refactoring code, or reviewing code quality.
Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code for maintainability and readability. Triggers on code reviews, naming discussions, function design, error handling, and test writing. Based on Robert C. Martin's Clean Code handbook.
Simplify and refine PHP/Laravel code for clarity and maintainability without changing behavior.
Perform a code review with linting, standards checking, and priority-ranked findings
A guide for writing self-documenting code
Break down a functional spec that is too complex into smaller specs that each imply ≤ 200 lines of code. Use when analyze-if-func-spec-too-complex flags a spec as TOO COMPLEX, or when a spec is suspected of being too large.
Enforces Rust language and module standards for maintainable codebases. Use when writing Rust code, structuring modules, separating SQL/prompts from code, and enforcing one-thing-per-file discipline.