Loading...
Loading...
Found 59 Skills
Resolve all TODO comments using parallel processing
Review code after implementation work to identify design flaws, abstraction issues, or maintenance risks that only became clear once real code was written. Use whenever the user asks whether a recent change exposed architectural problems, whether an abstraction is fighting the implementation, or whether a refactor is justified. Be conservative and avoid suggesting refactors without concrete evidence of recurring cost or complexity.
Analyzes coupling between modules using the three-dimensional model (strength, distance, volatility) from "Balancing Coupling in Software Design". Use when asking "are these modules too coupled?", "show me dependencies", "analyze integration quality", "which modules should I decouple?", "coupling report", or evaluating architectural health. Do NOT use for domain boundary analysis (use domain-analysis) or component sizing (use component-identification-sizing).
Consult this skill when working on any plugin to apply stewardship principles and virtues. Provides the five principles, five virtues (Care, Curiosity, Humility, Diligence, Foresight), layer-specific guidance, a decision heuristic for identifying stewardship moments, and a reflection template for workflow boundaries.
Intelligently handle git rebase operations and resolve merge conflicts while preserving features and maintaining code quality. Use when rebasing feature branches, resolving conflicts across commits, and ensuring clean linear history without losing changes.
· Audit AI-generated code slop: hallucinated APIs, over-abstraction, duplicate code, test theater, noisy comments. Triggers: 'slop', 'AI-generated code', 'cleanup', 'overengineered'. Not for prose (use anti-ai-prose).
Use gitcrawl to search duplicate OpenClaw PRs/issues, group related work in prtags, and sync duplicate state to GitHub.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "fix a bug with minimal changes", "analyze change scope for a bugfix", "find the minimal set of files to change", "do a focused bugfix", or "scope a minimal repair".
Fix a known bug in the Rock RMS codebase. Guides Claude through root cause analysis, minimal correct fix, and a release-note commit message. Use when the user says "fix this bug", "bugfix", "this is broken", "debug this", describes a bug with file paths or issue numbers, or pastes an error/stack trace with intent to fix. Also use when a bug is found by another skill (e.g. /review-conversion, /check) and the user wants it fixed. Do NOT use for: finding bugs (use /check or /review-conversion), adding features, or refactoring.
Applies software engineering best practices, design principles, and avoids common anti-patterns. Use when designing systems, reviewing code quality, refactoring legacy code, making architectural decisions, or improving maintainability.
Simplify and clean code
Dead code cleanup and consolidation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for removing unused code, duplicates, and refactoring. Runs analysis tools to identify dead code and safely removes it.