Loading...
Loading...
Found 111 Skills
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "/aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
Use when about to submit work, before committing or pushing, to run verification commands and confirm the work actually passes before claiming completion
TDD Skill for Team Workflows (Phase 3). Before writing any implementation code, you must first write a failing test and verify the failure, then write the minimal implementation until it passes, and finally refactor and re-test.
Diagnose and fix errors with Codex delegation. Traces error to root cause, researches approach, delegates fix, verifies. Use when: bug reports, error messages, stack traces, test failures.
Execute a GRACE development plan in controller-managed parallel waves with selectable safety profiles, batched graph sync, and scoped reviews.
Verify your own completed code changes using the repo's existing infrastructure and an independent evaluator context. Use after implementing a change when you need to run unit or integration tests, check build or lint gates, prove the real surface works with evidence, and challenge the changed code for clarity, deduplication, and maintainability. If the repo is not verifiable yet, hand off to `agent-readiness`; if you are reviewing someone else's code, use `review`.
Use this skill for mathematical code verification. Use when reviewing math-heavy code, verifying algorithm correctness, checking numerical stability, aligning with mathematical standards. Do not use when general algorithm review - use architecture-review. DO NOT use when: performance optimization - use parseltongue:python-performance.
Keeps implementation and specs in sync. Use when working on a feature that has a spec in .claude/specs/, when the user says /spec, or when starting implementation of a documented feature. Also use when the user asks to verify implementation against a spec or update a spec after changes.
Prove a claim of done, fixed, or passing by running the commands and reading the output before making it. Use before claiming work is complete, fixed, or tested, and before committing or opening a PR.
[user/auto] 하나의 pull request의 review feedback 또는 지원 가능한 GitHub Actions 실패를 fresh state로 읽고, 자연스러운 해결 계획을 합의한 뒤 필요 시 `seed.md`를 사용해 수정·검증·제한된 publication까지 처리합니다.
Require fresh verification evidence before claiming work is complete, fixed, passing, committed, PR-ready, or ready for handoff. Use before completion claims, commits, pushes, PR creation, issue status changes, delivery summaries, or agent handoffs; do not use for brainstorming or planning that makes no delivery claim.
A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions.