Loading...
Loading...
Found 45 Skills
Multidisciplinary decision-making using mental models from psychology, economics, mathematics, and science to identify high-conviction opportunities and avoid cognitive biases. Keywords: latticework, lollapalooza, circle of competence, inversion, moats. NOT for single-discipline analysis, high-frequency trading, or speculative diversification.
Adversarial thinking partner for founders and executives. Stress-tests plans, prepares for board meetings, dissects decisions with no good options, forces honest post-mortems, and identifies blind spots before competitors or board members do. Use when you need plan validation, board preparation, hard decision frameworks, assumption stress-testing, failure analysis, or when user mentions stress test, challenge, board prep, hard decision, pre-mortem, post-mortem, devil's advocate, plan review, or executive coaching.
Philosophical grounding for technical decisions across 19 traditions. Cross-domain synthesis mapped to 5 axioms (FIDELITY/PHI/VERIFY/CULTURE/BURN). φ-bounded at 61.8%. Use when facing dilemmas, questioning assumptions, or seeking wisdom.
Guidance on when to ask clarifying questions vs proceed with standard approaches. Reduces interaction rounds while preventing wrong assumptions.
Structured comparison of competing options with weighted scoring matrices, trade-off analysis, decision frameworks, and recommendation templates. Use when evaluating alternatives, making purchase decisions, or comparing strategies.
A framework for classifying product decisions based on impact and reversibility. Use this when you feel like a bottleneck for your team, when you have a massive backlog of choices to make, or when you need to justify spending weeks of research on a single high-stakes problem.
Use when facing questions with ethical weight, multiple valid approaches, significant trade-offs, or potential for harm - before answering, convene internal voices to discern rather than conclude
Internal skill. Use cc10x-router for all development tasks.
Weighted decision scoring framework for architectural and technology choices. Frames decisions with 2-4 options, scores against weighted criteria, detects close calls, and records decisions in the active ADR or task plan. Use when: "should I use X or Y", "which approach", "compare options", "trade-offs between", "help me decide", "evaluate alternatives"