Loading...
Loading...
Found 60 Skills
UX critique — hierarchy, clarity, anti-slop. No code changes unless asked. Invoke when the user asks for critique on their UI, or mentions 'critique' alongside design / UI / frontend work.
Stress-test a plan, design, or architecture through relentless interviewing. Use when user says "grill me", "challenge this", "stress test my design", "review my plan", wants a design interview, or needs to think through decisions before building. Two modes — collaborative interview (default) and devil's advocate.
Use this agent when you need to verify that a UI implementation matches its Figma design specifications. This agent should be called after code has been written to implement a design, particularly after HTML/CSS/React components have been created or modified. The agent will visually compare the live implementation against the Figma design and provide detailed feedback on discrepancies.\n\nExamples:\n- <example>\n Context: The user has just implemented a new component based on a Figma design.\n user: "I've finished implementing the hero section based on the Figma design"\n assistant: "I'll review how well your implementation matches the Figma design."\n <commentary>\n Since UI implementation has been completed, use the design-implementation-reviewer agent to compare the live version with Figma.\n </commentary>\n </example>\n- <example>\n Context: After the general code agent has implemented design changes.\n user: "Update the button styles to match the new design system"\n assistant: "I've updated the butto...
Critique UI/UX designs for clarity, hierarchy, interaction, accessibility, and craft. Use for design reviews, PR feedback on UI changes, evaluating mockups, checking if a component is ship-ready, or when honest feedback is needed on whether something meets a high bar.
This skill analyzes code for design quality improvements across 8 dimensions: Naming, Object Calisthenics, Coupling & Cohesion, Immutability, Domain Integrity, Type System, Simplicity, and Performance. Ensures rigorous, evidence-based analysis by: (1) Understanding code flow first via implementation-analysis protocol, (2) Systematically evaluating each dimension with specific criteria, (3) Providing actionable findings with file:line references. Triggers when users request: code analysis, design review, refactoring opportunities, code quality assessment, architecture evaluation.
10-parallel code/design review using reviewer subagents. Use when: - Running code reviews on PRs, commits, or branches - Running design reviews on issues or documents - Need multi-perspective review (security, architecture, code, QA, historian)
Set up the Inflight feedback widget, authenticate with the CLI, and share staging URLs for design review. Use when the user wants to collect design feedback, add Inflight to a project, or share a staging deployment for review.
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "ask me questions".
Pencil Design Skill for Team Workflows (Phase 2). Produce design.pen (or declare no UI design) based on requirements and plans, and prepare G2 design review materials.
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
Convene 11 role-specialized Claude agents to debate technical decisions in parallel, with the invoking Claude acting as CEO
Structure compelling design presentations for stakeholders, reviews, and showcases.