Loading...
Loading...
Found 46 Skills
React to the user's Telegram message with an emoji. Use when the message evokes a genuine emotional response.
NEVER escalate without investigation first. This is the Iron Law. Use when evaluating whether to escalate models, facing genuine complexity requiring deeper reasoning, novel patterns with no existing solutions, high-stakes decisions requiring capability investment. Do not use when thrashing without investigation - investigate root cause first. DO NOT use when: time pressure alone - urgency doesn't change task complexity. DO NOT use when: "just to be safe" - assess actual complexity instead.
Ensures tasks are genuinely resolved before marking them done. Activates at task checkpoints during plan execution — validates that fixes actually work, tests genuinely pass, and acceptance criteria are met. Prevents premature completion declarations.
Detect whether an API endpoint is backed by genuine Claude (not a wrapper, proxy, or impersonator) using 9 weighted rule-based checks that mirror the claude-verify project. Also extracts injected system prompts from providers that override Claude's identity. Fully self-contained — copy the code below and run, no extra packages beyond httpx. Use when the user wants to verify a Claude API key or endpoint, check if a third-party Claude service is authentic, audit API providers for Claude authenticity, test multiple models in parallel, or discover what system prompt a provider has injected.
Use when creating product recommendation content on Xiaohongshu, writing posts that naturally lead to purchases, developing authentic product reviews, building trust through genuine product experiences, or planning content that converts readers to buyers
Use when a task fails, an approach does not work, when encountering errors during implementation, or when tempted to say "I cannot do this" - ensures retry with at least 3 genuinely different approaches before escalating
Make text more genuine, natural, and feel not written by an AI or LLM by removing AI tropes and cliches. Use when asked to deslopify, naturalize, or remove AI tropes from text.
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
Daily digest of 3-7 genuinely surprising items from newsletters and Telegram channels. Scores content for epistemic friction, not just relevance. Appends to daily note. Use when the user says "/wow-digest", "run the wow digest", "what's surprising today", "morning reading", or "digest my newsletters".
Critical-thinking brainstorming partner that acts as a requirements analyst. Use when users present ideas, feature requests, or problems they want to solve. Triggers include "I want to build", "help me validate", "users need", "I'm thinking of creating", or any request involving problem/solution validation. This skill aggressively challenges assumptions, questions perceived problems, demands evidence, and ensures solutions address genuine needs before exploring implementation.