Loading...
Loading...
Found 55 Skills
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
Design LLM-as-Judge evaluators for subjective criteria that code-based checks cannot handle. Use when a failure mode requires interpretation (tone, faithfulness, relevance, completeness). Do NOT use when the failure mode can be checked with code (regex, schema validation, execution tests). Do NOT use when you need to validate or calibrate the judge — use validate-evaluator instead.
Write, refine, run, and QA promptfoo evaluation suites: promptfooconfig.yaml, prompts, providers, vars, tests, assertions, model-graded rubrics, transforms, datasets, exports, and CI gates. Use for non-redteam eval coverage, regression tests, or new eval matrices. Do not use for adversarial redteam plugin or strategy setup.
MCP (Model Context Protocol) server build and evaluation guide, including local conventions for tool surfaces, config, and testing
Open-source AI observability platform for LLM tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications with detailed traces, running evaluations on datasets, or monitoring production AI systems with real-time insights.
Cross-model benchmark for gstack skills. Runs the same prompt through Claude, GPT (via Codex CLI), and Gemini side-by-side — compares latency, tokens, cost, and optionally quality via LLM judge. Answers "which model is actually best for this skill?" with data instead of vibes. Separate from /benchmark, which measures web page performance. Use when: "benchmark models", "compare models", "which model is best for X", "cross-model comparison", "model shootout". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "compare models", "model shootout", "which model is best".
Evaluates accuracy of quantized or unquantized LLMs using NeMo Evaluator Launcher (NEL). Triggers on "evaluate model", "benchmark accuracy", "run MMLU", "evaluate quantized model", "accuracy drop", "run nel". Handles deployment, config generation, and evaluation execution. Not for quantizing models (use ptq) or deploying/serving models (use deployment).
Create custom LLM evaluation benchmarks using the BYOB decorator framework. Use when the user wants to (1) create a new benchmark from a dataset, (2) pick or write a scorer, (3) compile and run a BYOB benchmark, (4) containerize a benchmark, or (5) use LLM-as-Judge evaluation. Triggers on mentions of BYOB, custom benchmark, bring your own benchmark, scorer, or benchmark compilation.
Produce an LLM Build Pack (prompt+tool contract, data/eval plan, architecture+safety, launch checklist). Use for building with LLMs, GPT/Claude apps, prompt engineering, RAG, and tool-using agents.
Calibrate an LLM judge against human labels using data splits, TPR/TNR, and bias correction. Use after writing a judge prompt (write-judge-prompt) when you need to verify alignment before trusting its outputs. Do NOT use for code-based evaluators (those are deterministic; test with standard unit tests).
Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).
Use when evaluating LLMs, running benchmarks like MMLU/HumanEval/GSM8K, setting up evaluation pipelines, or asking about "NeMo Evaluator", "LLM benchmarking", "model evaluation", "MMLU", "HumanEval", "GSM8K", "benchmark harnesses"