Loading...
Loading...
Found 141 Skills
Implement FireCrawl lint rules, policy enforcement, and automated guardrails. Use when setting up code quality rules for FireCrawl integrations, implementing pre-commit hooks, or configuring CI policy checks for FireCrawl best practices. Trigger with phrases like "firecrawl policy", "firecrawl lint", "firecrawl guardrails", "firecrawl best practices check", "firecrawl eslint".
Apply Python development policy using uv-first execution, test-first behavior validation, and pre-commit quality gates. Use when implementing or refactoring Python code.
Install a pre-commit hook that scans .specstory/history for secrets before commits. Run when user says "set up secret scanning", "install specstory guard", "protect my history", or "check for secrets".
Set up Biome for fast linting and formatting in JavaScript/TypeScript projects, including editor integration, package scripts, optional pre-commit hooks, and migration from ESLint + Prettier. Use when adding or standardizing lint/format tooling, replacing ESLint/Prettier, or troubleshooting Biome configuration and workflow issues.
Implement Exa lint rules, policy enforcement, and automated guardrails. Use when setting up code quality rules for Exa integrations, implementing pre-commit hooks, or configuring CI policy checks for Exa best practices. Trigger with phrases like "exa policy", "exa lint", "exa guardrails", "exa best practices check", "exa eslint".
Run security audit with GitLeaks pre-commit hook setup and code analysis
Code quality standards — lint (eslint/oxlint), type check (tsc), pre-commit hooks, and comment conventions. All comments must be in English.
Multi-language code quality gate with auto-detection and language-specific linters. Use when user asks to "run quality checks", "quality gate", "lint all", "check everything", "pre-commit checks", or "is this code ready to commit". Use for verifying code quality across polyglot repos. Do NOT use for single-language linting (use code-linting) or comprehensive code review (use systematic-code-review).
Review local git changes from 8 expert perspectives using multi-agent team orchestration. Produces a consolidated report with Critical/Important/Nice-to-have severity levels. Lightweight pre-commit or pre-push quality gate — no PR or branch push required. Use when the user asks to review local changes, check changes before committing, get a team review of working tree changes, or run a pre-commit review. Trigger phrases include "review local", "review my changes", "review local changes", "pre-commit review", "review before commit", "review before push", "team review my changes", "check my changes", "review working tree", "local code review", "review diff", "review my diff".
Use when completing a task, implementing a feature, or before committing to verify work meets requirements and coding standards. Triggers: task completion, pre-commit check, pre-merge validation, plan alignment verification, post-refactor quality gate.
Python code quality with ruff (linting & formatting) and mypy (type checking). Covers pyproject.toml configuration, pre-commit hooks, and type hints. Use when user mentions ruff, mypy, linting, formatting, type checking, code style, or Python code quality.
Standards for code linting, formatting, and pre-commit hooks.