Loading...
Loading...
Found 74 Skills
Reviews codebases, architectures, PRs, and technical plans for vanity engineering — code and systems built for the developer's ego, resume, or intellectual pleasure rather than delivering user or business value. Triggers on: "review this code", "is this over-engineered", "code review", "architecture review", "complexity audit", "vanity check", "is this necessary", "simplify this", "tech debt review", or any request to evaluate whether code or architecture is justified by actual requirements. Also trigger when the user shares a codebase and asks for feedback, when discussing framework/library choices, when reviewing PRs, or when someone is debating whether to refactor or rebuild. Nudge activation when you detect patterns of unnecessary abstraction, premature optimization, or resume-driven technology choices in code the user shares — even if they haven't asked for a vanity review.
Enforce and guide the Mikado Method when a developer is refactoring, restructuring, or dealing with legacy code. Use this skill whenever the user mentions refactoring, technical debt, legacy code, code restructuring, dependency untangling, or "breaking everything" when making changes. Also trigger when the user wants to make a large change safely, asks how to split a big refactoring task, wants to work on main branch without a long-lived feature branch, or asks how to incrementally improve a codebase. The skill enforces the full Mikado loop: goal → naive attempt → map prerequisites → revert → implement leaves → commit → repeat.
You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects. Analyze the codebase to uncover debt, assess its impact, and create acti
Provides refactoring recommendations and step-by-step improvement plans. Use when planning refactoring, improving code structure, or reducing technical debt.
Modernize legacy codebases, migrate frameworks, and reduce technical debt. Use for legacy system updates or framework migrations.
Translates engineering metrics (DORA, error rates, technical debt) into business KPIs and financial impact. Helps justify technical investments to stakeholders.
Analyze codebases for anti-patterns, code smells, and quality issues using ast-grep structural pattern matching. Use when reviewing code quality, identifying technical debt, or performing comprehensive code analysis across JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Vue, React, or other supported languages.
Provides final code cleanup after task review approval. Removes debug logs, temporary comments, dead code, optimizes imports, and improves readability. Use when asked to clean up code, polish, finalize, tidy up, remove technical debt, or prepare code for completion after review. Not for refactoring logic or fixing bugs—focused solely on cosmetic and hygiene cleanup.
Aggressively clean up a codebase by removing AI slop, dead code, weak types, defensive over-engineering, duplication, and legacy cruft. Orchestrates 8 specialized subagents in parallel to deduplicate code, consolidate types, kill unused code, untangle circular dependencies, strengthen weak types, remove unnecessary try/catch, delete deprecated/legacy paths, and strip unhelpful comments. Use when the user asks to 'clean up the codebase', 'remove slop', 'improve code quality', 'remove dead code', 'kill AI slop', 'tighten types', 'remove legacy code', 'deduplicate code', 'DRY this up', 'untangle dependencies', or wants a thorough code quality pass. Also use when the user mentions code smells, technical debt cleanup, or refactoring for clarity — even if they don't use the word 'slop'.
Find technical debt patterns in codebases. Use when asked to find duplicated code, inconsistent patterns, or refactoring opportunities.
Code refactoring expert for improving code quality, readability, maintainability, and performance. Specializes in Java and Python refactoring patterns, eliminating code smells, and applying clean code principles. Use when refactoring code, improving existing implementations, or cleaning up technical debt.
Systematic framework for resurrecting and modernizing legacy codebases through archaeology, resurrection, and rejuvenation phases. Activate on "legacy code", "inherited codebase", "no documentation", "technical debt", "resurrect", "modernize". NOT for greenfield projects or well-documented active codebases.