Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,007 Skills
Used to confirm that development is completed and ensure all tests/checks have passed
Refactor, simplify, or clean up code for improved maintainability without changing business logic
Full code review, fix, quality, PR workflow. Chains review-branch, address-review, check-quality, and pr. Use when: code complete and ready for PR, want comprehensive review before shipping.
Code comment guidelines. Remove redundant comments, add strategic ones explaining WHY not WHAT. Applied automatically when modifying code.
Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback. Covers documentation requirements, DESCRIPTION field standards, URL validation, examples, and administrative requirements.
Global Agent rules, including language, response style, debugging priority, engineering quality baseline, mandatory code metric limits, security baseline, test verification standards and Skills routing table. Applicable to all programming tasks.
Comprehensive Python expertise covering language fundamentals, idiomatic patterns, software design principles, and production best practices. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, or refactoring Python code. Triggers: Python, .py files, pip, uv, pytest, dataclasses, asyncio, type hints, or any Python library.
Pull request and code review with diff-based routing across five dimensions: code quality and guideline compliance, test coverage analysis, silent failure detection, type design and invariant analysis, and comment quality auditing. Classifies changed files and loads only relevant review methodologies. Produces severity-ranked findings (Critical, Important, Suggestion) with confidence scoring. Replaces pr-review-toolkit plugin. Trigger phrases: "review my PR", "review this code", "check my changes", "is this ready to merge", "audit this PR", "review before committing", "check code quality", "any issues with this code", "pre-merge review", "look over my changes", "code review". Use this skill when reviewing code before commit or merge, checking PR quality, or when the user asks for feedback on recent modifications.
Request peer review with proper context and preparation. Structures review requests with clear description of changes and testing status.
Use before claiming work is done, fixed, or passing — requires running verification commands and confirming output before any success claim. Prevents false completion claims, unverified assertions, and "should work" statements.
Run a structured, adversarial multi-agent bug review pipeline on a codebase. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find bugs, audit code quality, review a codebase for issues, or run any kind of bug-finding or code analysis workflow. Also trigger when the user asks to 'review my code for bugs', 'find all issues in this repo', 'audit this codebase', or any similar request. The pipeline uses three sequential phases: a Bug Finder that maximizes issue discovery, a Bug Adversary that challenges false positives, and an Arbiter that issues final verdicts — producing a clean, high-confidence bug report.
Master Git hooks setup with Husky, lint-staged, pre-commit framework, and commitlint. Automate code quality gates, formatting, linting, and commit message enforcement before code reaches CI.