Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,007 Skills
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
Review pull requests for the MiniMax Skills repository. Use when reviewing PRs, validating new skill submissions, or checking existing skills for compliance. Run the validation script first for hard checks, then apply quality guidelines for content review. Triggers: PR review, pull request, validate skill, check skill.
Execute a micro-level NestJS code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, architecture, DTO validation, error handling, and code implementation. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check NestJS code quality, validate best practices, or review backend code standards. Triggers on: 'nestjs best practices', 'backend code quality', 'code review', 'nestjs standards', 'dto validation', 'error handling review'.
Execute a micro-level React code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, component architecture, hooks patterns, state management, performance, and TypeScript. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check React code quality, validate best practices, or review frontend code standards. Triggers on: 'react best practices', 'react code quality', 'component review', 'hooks review', 'react standards', 'frontend code quality'.
Guide for writing inline comments and JSDoc in the codebase. Use when generating code for bug fixes, new components, refactoring, or feature implementation.
Detects common LLM coding agent artifacts by spawning 4 parallel subagents
Chinese Code Review Guidelines - Provide effective feedback in a way that aligns with domestic team culture while maintaining professionalism and rigor
Follow this sub-process when fixing bugs—turn the verbal description of "discovered a problem" into a closed loop of verification and repair, leaving three documents in the middle: issue report, root cause analysis, and repair record. This process adds a buffer between "seeing the problem" and "starting to modify code", avoiding several common pitfalls: the problem description in your mind disappears after modification, fixing only the surface without analyzing the root cause, uncontrollable expansion of repair scope that cannot be traced, and not knowing if the fix is correct without verification after modification. This skill only acts as a router, deciding which of report / analyze / fix to proceed with based on existing outputs. For simple problems that can be identified at a glance, a fast track will be taken, skipping the two middle steps and only keeping the fix-note.
Review a pull request — check diff, run tests, report findings
Modern PHP application development guidance for PHP 8.3+, Symfony, Composer, PHPUnit/Pest, PHPStan, Psalm, PSR standards, Doctrine, DTOs, value objects, dependency injection, migrations, middleware, and REST or GraphQL APIs. Use when Codex needs to build, refactor, test, statically analyze, or review PHP code and framework integrations.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Run a final code review on a pull request