Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,948 Skills
Build institutional-grade comparable company analyses with operating metrics, valuation multiples, and statistical benchmarking in Excel/spreadsheet format. **Perfect for:** - Public company valuation (M&A, investment analysis) - Benchmarking performance vs. industry peers - Pricing IPOs or funding rounds - Identifying valuation outliers (over/under-valued) - Supporting investment committee presentations - Creating sector overview reports **Not ideal for:** - Private companies without comparable public peers - Highly diversified conglomerates - Distressed/bankrupt companies - Pre-revenue startups - Companies with unique business models
This skill should be used when the user wants to run baseline evaluations on existing agent skills, regenerate transcripts after a model upgrade, or check whether a skill still solves the gap it was authored for. Common triggers include "rerun the baselines", "re-eval skill X", "test all the skills", "check for skill drift", and "run the evals". Bakes in verbatim transcript capture (no paraphrasing), deterministic-only grading (regex / contains / file_exists — no LLM-as-judge), and the iteration-N workspace convention. Skip when authoring a new skill (use skill-creator) or modifying skill content directly.
Retrieve market capitalization data for a single company using Octagon MCP. Use when you need the current market value, valuation context, or size classification for any publicly traded stock.
Use when the user wants to iterate on a viral-article scoring system itself, calibrate or improve a scoring prompt against labeled samples, or run batch scoring experiments on a fixed article set. Best for prompt-only scoring research where the evaluator scripts stay fixed and only the scoring rubric/prompt is meant to evolve.
You must use this when critiquing academic manuscripts, evaluating methodological rigor, or providing structured reviewer feedback.
Measures the task accuracy of text models served by MAX using standard benchmarks such as GSM8K, MMLU, HellaSwag, ARC, AIME, GPQA, TruthfulQA, WinoGrande, and BABILong. Use when benchmarking a served model, comparing it with model-card or reference scores, verifying that a new MAX model produces correct answers, or running repeatable dataset evaluations against a MAX OpenAI-compatible endpoint.
Market intelligence, competitive analysis, technical evaluations, and technology decisions. Use when researching companies, analyzing competitors, evaluating frameworks, or making tech stack decisions.
Build a structured taxonomy of failure modes from open-coded trace annotations. Use this skill whenever the user has freeform annotations from reviewing LLM traces and wants to cluster them into a coherent, non-overlapping set of binary failure categories (axial coding). Also use when the user mentions "failure modes", "error taxonomy", "axial coding", "cluster annotations", "categorize errors", "failure analysis", or wants to go from raw observation notes to structured evaluation criteria. This skill covers the full pipeline: grouping open codes, defining failure modes, re-labeling traces, and quantifying error rates.
MantaBase T3 Hardware Audit System (Chinese Version). Objectively classify hardware products based on design theories through Brand Blinding, three Auditor (Tool/Toy/Trash) special scoring and Peer Review. Triggers: product link, T3 audit, Tool/Toy/Trash classification, hardware evaluation, VC investment advice
Run verification checks for a task and evaluate results. Use when the user wants to verify a task's acceptance criteria.
Playdate game development in Lua with the Playdate SDK, including game loop, sprites, graphics, input (crank, buttons, accelerometer), UI, performance, metadata (pdxinfo), and simulator/device workflow. Use when asked to make a Playdate game, implement Playdate-specific mechanics, or apply Playdate design and accessibility guidelines.
Expert at analyzing the quality and effectiveness of Claude Code components (agents, skills, commands, hooks). Assumes component is already technically valid. Evaluates description clarity, tool permissions, auto-invoke triggers, security, and usability to provide quality scores and improvement suggestions.