Loading...
Loading...
Found 614 Skills
Outsider-perspective end-to-end review of a plan, PR, or code change. First questions intent and whether a simpler/more elegant approach would achieve the same goal, then traces the actual code path (not just the diff) to verify the change does what it claims. Output is concise, actionable, and every call carries its rationale. Trigger on /scrutinize and proactively whenever the user asks to review, audit, sanity-check, or get a second opinion on a plan, PR, diff, design doc, or proposed code change.
Single-pass feature implementation using Explore → Code → Test. Ships focused changes at maximum speed, with a built-in circuit breaker that stops and recommends `/apex` or `/forge` when the task turns out more complex than it looked. Use this whenever the user wants a quick win on a single, focused task — even when they don't say "oneshot" (e.g. "just", "quickly", "small change", "#42", or a GitHub issue URL for a small fix).
You MUST use this when writing or editing prose anywhere in a project (docs, READMEs, marketing copy, commit messages) and when asked to audit, score, or clean up negative parallelism, the "it's not just X, it's Y" construction. It bans defining things by negation-plus-contrast in favor of direct positive statements and grades a project's compliance on a 0-100 scale.
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
Build, deploy, and secure Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers on Netlify. Use whenever the task involves creating an MCP server, exposing an app or API to AI agents as MCP tools, letting Claude / Cursor / Claude Code call a custom remote server, or adding MCP tools to an existing Netlify site. Covers the MCP SDK + Streamable HTTP transport on a Netlify Function, authentication (single shared secret vs per-user API keys with Netlify Identity), read/write safety, file uploads, and connecting clients. Use even when the user just says "MCP", "tool server for an agent", or "let an AI use my API".
Extract self-contained static HTML from a built web application or React components by inlining CSS and images. Use this skill whenever you need to capture a specific UI state, share a static version of a page, or prepare assets for Stitch upload, even if the user just asks to 'save the HTML' or 'mock the view'.
Use when the user is building or refactoring UI in their product codebase and wants designer-quality frontend code — not just functional code. Triggers on phrases like "design better", "make this UI feel more designed", "elevate the design quality", "build this with design best practices", "follow UX heuristics", "make this feel professional", "apply design polish", "review this for craft", or any request to apply UX/UI craft heuristics to code generation or review. Pairs with `docs/design.md` when it exists — the design system file owns **style** (colors, typography, spacing tokens, components), this skill owns **craft** (hierarchy, interaction, accessibility, motion, polish). Reference `docs/design.md` tokens by name for every visual decision; apply the 50-item heuristics catalogue and the Laws of UX catalogue below for every craft decision. When `docs/design.md` is absent, fall back to the codebase's existing design conventions and recommend the **Design System** skill. When a heuristic implies a token the design system doesn't have, flag it as a New Pattern to add via the **Design System** skill — never invent a value inline. Fully standalone.
Unity UI expert for menus, HUDs, screens, panels, buttons, labels, and all visual interface elements. Handles questions about UI in scenes or prefabs (how many elements, what exists, structure analysis), styling changes (colors, borders, backgrounds, fonts, spacing, rounded corners), layout adjustments, and UI generation. Routes to UI Toolkit, uGUI, or IMGUI based on project context.
Generate a personal Claude Code usage & impact report ("receipts") from this machine's local session transcripts — for justifying Claude Code usage/spend to a manager, self-review, or "what have I been using this for" check-ins. Mines ~/.claude/projects locally (no extra API calls beyond one final write-up), cross-references local git history, and writes a markdown report plus a self-contained HTML receipt to your home directory. Use when the user asks for "receipts", an "impact report", "usage report", wants to "show my Claude Code activity", "prove the value of Claude Code", or runs `/receipts`.
Facilitates the learning step of a proven customer-interview method — the recording half: turning raw material from ONE customer conversation (transcript, notes, memory dump) into a brief per-person debrief file, mapped against the numbered interview-question list (Q1, Q2, … with H-number tags). One concise answer per question actually asked, key phrases kept verbatim, unasked questions honestly skipped, a one-line commentary only where in-the-moment context helps later analysis, and an addenda section for everything heard that fit no question. Load when the user has just done a customer interview and says 'here's the transcript,' 'process my call notes,' 'file this conversation against my questions,' or 'add this interview to the record.' Do NOT load for writing goals, hypotheses, or interview questions (earlier steps), for synthesizing patterns across multiple interviews and updating hypotheses (the next step), or for summarizing meetings or transcripts unrelated to customer interviews.
Builds a customer Needs Stack — the ladder in which every need is a means to the end one level up (buy infrastructure → set up a WordPress site → have a personal website → get a book deal). Anchors the level the user's product satisfies, phrased as the customer's own goal in the customer's own words, then walks downward (the steps the product makes obsolete) and upward (what the customer really wants), crystallizing every level — specific wording, a true means-to-an-end link, named real-world occupants — before moving on. Records the stack in NEEDS-STACK.md with the user's level marked and each level's positioning role: what you do, promise, reference as aspiration, or brag about obviating. Load when the user asks what their customer really wants, what level their product operates at, who their real alternatives (not just competitors) are, or to 'build our needs stack.' Do NOT load to rewrite marketing copy from a finished stack — that is a separate positioning task that consumes this file.
Full brand naming workflow for founders, agencies, and businesses. Use this skill whenever the user says "help me name this brand", "brand naming", "I need a name for", "name ideas for", "what should I call my brand/company/product", "naming a startup", "brand name suggestions", "help with naming", or shares a brand brief and asks for name options. Also triggers when the user shares existing name options and asks for feedback, evaluation, ranking, or scoring of those names. Auto-detects whether to run the full generation workflow or the evaluation workflow based on what the user provides. Always use this skill for any brand or product naming task — even if the user just casually mentions needing a name.